473
Jon Stewart takes aim at his former Apple bosses on ‘The Daily Show’ (www.vanityfair.com)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This week, Jon Stewart devoted his edition of The Daily Show to tackling a topic that he claims his former bosses at Apple barred him from exploring. “I wanted to have you on a podcast and Apple asked us not to do it,” the late-night host said to his guest Monday night, Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, referencing the companion podcast to his former series, The Problem with Jon Stewart that ended last October. “They literally said, ‘Please don’t talk to her.’”

Stewart’s remarks arrive less than two weeks after the U.S. Justice Department sued Apple for exploiting its monopoly in the tech market and violating antitrust laws. The lawsuit highlights Apple’s “power over content creators and newspapers” and notes that the company’s conduct “even affects the flow of speech,” adding, “Apple is rapidly expanding its role as a TV and movie producer and has exercised that role to control content.”

After joking that Apple killed Khan’s potential appearance on the podcast because “I didn’t think they cared for you,” Stewart alleged that Apple also told him not to discuss artificial intelligence. “They wouldn’t let us do even that dumb thing we just did in the first act on AI,” he said, referring to a segment earlier in that episode on the “false promise” of that technology. Stewart then asked Khan: “What is that sensitivity? Why are they so afraid to even have these conversations out in the public sphere?”

Khan replied, “I think it just shows the danger of what happens when you concentrate so much power and so much decision making in a small number of companies.”

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mansfield@lemmy.world 131 points 8 months ago

When you work for Apple, Apple gets to tell you what to do. Same goes for any corporate owned media outlet.

Jon Stewart has more than enough money to just quit, which he did. Most normal folks do not have this luxury so they tow the line.

Welcome to the reality that the US economic system.

No real free speech, no real agency in our economy, captive regulators that like to masquerade as populist heros but rarely actually do any real damage to sociopathic corporations.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 45 points 8 months ago

Common misconception, it's actually "toe the line". I used to think it was tow too.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 8 points 7 months ago

I guess that makes sense, like saying 'I'm doing ten toes' when you're walking, you toe the line means your walking close to the line but not over?

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

It came from the navy, with everyone standing with their toe to an imaginary line.

[-] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 8 months ago

"He who pays the piper, calls the tune" is an old saying and not any less true today. If your livelihood and that of your family depends on someone, very, very few people will antagonize this someone.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

State owned news media sounds like a bad idea from communistic countries, but nevertheless, plenty of European countries have just that, and it's noteworthy how it's much less biased than the commercial outlets. The people pay the piper.

It actually works in democratic countries where the government is representative of the people, so that any single party can't push their agenda to the media by laws. On the contrary it happens more often that the media is told to keep a straight line if they go too far in any direction.

It's no wonder it doesn't work in dictatorships, and I don't think it would work in two party politics, but in European countries the state media is very likely the less biased one.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

PBS exists 😶

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

**It's not state owned.

Though the people do pay them, so I guess that's the important part.

Also, NPR.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I knew I was forgetting one. But yes, a state ownd independent media would be nice. I'd be grateful just for reinstating the fairness doctrine at this point

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

In Dutch we say: "wiens brood men eet, diens woord men spreekt" which convolutedly translates to: "who's bread one eats, thine word one speaks".. which shows this is present in many cultures.

[-] ConstableJelly@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I sympathize with the cynicism in your last paragraph, but I push a little optimism back on a couple points. 1: our capability for speech may be limited by the corporations who have grabbed control over our media platforms, but insofar as freedom of speech refers to our ability to speak freely without retaliation from the government, we do still have real free speech. It's a juvenile point, but given events in the last few years it's not a right I take for granted as I did previously. That being said, I did just watch a video of FBI agents interrogating a woman in front of her house for posting non-violent content on Facebook relating to Gaza that you can add to a pile of evidence that the government is frequently toeing the line on free speech, so... that's not good.

2: Regulatory authority has become almost laughably meek, granted, but you're commenting on a video of one of the most aggressive regulators to hold the position in as long as I'm aware. This is a powerful sign that regulatory capture is not inevitable if we care enough to vote for candidates who will appoint strong regulators -- even if it hurts our pride to do so (<<conscientious vote objectors).

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

the government is frequently toeing the line on free speech

We need to have a lemmy-wide class on the phrase "toe the line" because this is the 2nd time it's been used incorrectly in this thread.

I think what you mean to say is "pushing the envelope". To "toe the line" means to support and parrot what an authority body says, even if you personally have different ideas, like Sanders endorsing Biden. What the government is doing is infringing on free speech.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Jon Stewart has more than enough money to just quit, which he did.

Celebrity is often its own reward. And Stewart wasn't getting much coverage when he didn't have a show, despite some very sincere and fervent lobbying efforts during his retirement period.

No real free speech, no real agency in our economy, captive regulators that like to masquerade as populist heros but rarely actually do any real damage to sociopathic corporations.

One of the more infuriating bits about liberal agitprop shows is how fucking devoid of agitprop they actually are. Yeah, guys like Stewart and Colbert and Oliver can go on rhetorical tirades about the Big Evil Business Thing. But when push comes to shove, what do they actually advocate? Noncompliance? Organized revolt? A general strike? Confrontations with abusive and cartelized law enforcement? Any kind of material self-defense or defense of one's friends and neighbors? Anything that might violate the latest round of right-wing prohibitions on health care or gender or speech?

Or do they just put on a "Rally to Restore Sanity" that tells people activism begins and ends with voting, in an election system that's increasingly threadbare?

[-] Manmoth@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The fact that Jon Stewart worked for Apple for a podcast and is now again on television working for some TV station shows that he has very little to offer in the way of anything meaningful. He had more than enough notoriety to start a podcast in his basement where he could say anything he wanted and get compelling guests. He has more than enough money to hire a crew and create a self-produced show online and get real viewership. People should really ask themselves why he is sticking with the big companies. It's because he likes the money and is an expert at getting the narrative out there. The Daily Show has always been lowest common denominator "subversion" that takes itself seriously enough to shame non-approved worldviews but not enough to be held accountable in any meaningful way. It's like if a teenager was a show.

Love or hate Tucker Carlson he is doing what Jon Stewart should have done years ago.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

Tucker and Stewart are both just the dead end of modern entertainment journalism. Guys who haven't been relevant in nearly a decade showing back up on mediums with declining user bases to appeal to an audience that's getting older and grumpier and more out-of-touch than their Boomer-era peers from the early '00s.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 8 months ago

Good reminder that Monday's The Daily Show is Jon Stewart day

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I don't even watch the other ones. Sorry other people. Just change it to the weekly show at this point

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

The other hosts have their moments, but they ain't Jonny Boy.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Nobody is Jonny Boy, except maybe Johnny Boy, but you gotta give the other folks a shot. We need more.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I'd like to see Craigers come back for a show during this period without a permanent host.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Desi Lydic has been killing it as host. Very happy she's the host for the rest of the week.

Great comedic timing.

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 49 points 7 months ago

Lena Khan is amazing and taught me the word monopsylony. Absolutely stoked that Biden chose her and the fact that she is going so hard on creating a competitive environment

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

I want people to understand that when they vote for a president they're also voting for all the administrative appointments as well. The stakes of who is president is already high enough, but if you want people like Lena Khan in charge, that also comes from your presidential vote.

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

As I'm Australian, I can't do much haha. But I do know that the vibe on corporations and monoplane monopolies is being imported into Australia from the US particularly around our supermarkets and airlines

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 19 points 7 months ago
[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Sorry, yeah that'll teach me for writing before I've woken up

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Is this the "30 Rock" vertical integration equivalent?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

and taught me the word monopsylony

mo·nop·so·ny
noun.
ECONOMICS.
a market situation in which there is only one buyer. Definitions from Oxford

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Man I wish he'd somehow start that podcast back up. It was so good. I really watch the show but the podcast I listen to every time it came out.

Edit: hold up, there might be hope. After making this post on a whim I checked on the podcast and there was a one minute trailer from February saying stick around he wants to do something with the podcast feed again. How about that? I mean almost 2 months ago so not quick but maybe hope.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
473 points (99.2% liked)

News

23409 readers
1934 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world