I cleaned up some of the comments because there was some bickering and fighting. This is a reminder for everyone to be nice on our instance.

It's okay to not like the new flag. It's not okay to call other users racist because they enjoy one pride flag over another.

Given the unprecedented attacks on trans folks and the much higher murder rates of poc queers I think giving them space on the progress flag is more about making a statement about inclusivity and intersectionality than anything else.

Trying to include more groups like bisexual is just missing the point and people arguing that the progress flag should stay the way it is (although no one is talking about the intersex inclusive one which is an interesting statement on the erasure of intersex individuals), is more about the recognition of that statement and trying not to water down the message with a dash of design because it's already pretty crowded.

Ultimately I do not care which flag you fly. It's okay to say that you don't like the design of a particular flag, but you should stop a second before commenting that and think a bit about what you could possibly accomplish with such a statement. It's not your flag and you're not flying it, so ultimately does it matter what you think of it's design? Do you walk up to people with shirts you think are designed poorly and say "your shirt sucks, get a new shirt"? All you're going to do is make them defensive and you're pretty likely to start a fight, especially if you go off on some weird tangent about how you think the flag is bigoted in some fashion. The old adage 'if you don't have something nice to say, don't say anything at all' is pretty much designed for situations like this.

Can somecritter please explain to me how it's June <.< My sources inform me that it's April and I think that April is not June.

Also if being a little extra inclusive is "sowing division" then maybe the community in question has some serious issues with gatekeeping or some other kind of exclusivity. Like, damn, multiple flags can exist at once. If this one cracks someone's ass they're free to fly another instead. No need to demand I buy three bits of cloth if I'm happy just using one.

I think more flag designs are a good thing. It's not like this bi-inclusive flag means it's now illegal to fly the previous version of the progress flag, or an identity-specific flag. Everybody can just pick a flag that resonates with them and allows them to express themselves.

That flag design is a travesty. I'm sorry, but it just is.

The progress flag looks okay, but this just is not it.

Isn't the rainbow supposed to symbolize diversity? I mean, maybe you want to highlight a specific identity, but then each also happens to have it's own flag nowadays which you can use...

Darlings, why don't we just all fly the design we prefer, as long as it doesn't include any hate symbols, or explicitly tries to exclude someone.

As a bi person, I find an extra bi flag kinda superfluous, but if someone likes to have it on there, go for it.

Sadly, there will always be people pulling "All lives matter"-esque b.s., even on the Left. What's even sadder is that they've (consciously or otherwise) bought into the Right-wing narrative that not including every group equally when showing support is exclusionary to people or characteristics that are not in fact in need of that support, but also, as we see here, sometimes even taking the stance that only they get to determine the version that is 'properly' inclusive, not anyone else.

To wit, if the standard Pride flag is meant to represent everyone, equally including cisgender straight white folks, then it's by definition not a symbol of especial support for marginalized folks. If it's not inclusive of cisgender straight white folks, then who else is it not inclusive of, if the colors aren't actually being mapped to specific groups?

It makes perfect sense to me why variations have emerged, and there's no need to try to pare the field down artificially. New flags emerge all the time, and fall in and out of use. Flags are a choice about how you present yourself, in choosing to fly them, and it's not anyone's place to be telling other people they are beholden to use a certain flag.

"We have a flag that represents you all, but your communities don't get to decide if it represents you, or if you would be better represented in another way, you listen to me!" - Such a very inclusive mindset! /s

I consider then immediately disregard the possibility that due to an ever increasing number of marginalized groups being included, the flag will eventually devolve into piece #196 from the babel image archives