246
submitted 7 months ago by Glass0448@lemmy.today to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Okokimup@lemmy.world 83 points 7 months ago

Love this bit:

“The State of Florida has not justified this grave restraint, and so the United States Constitution does not tolerate it. Ours is a Union of individuals, celebrating ourselves and singing ourselves and being ourselves without apology.”

[-] jdf038@mander.xyz 28 points 7 months ago

Me too! I feel like this quote really shows off the care and humanity of the judge. While you see that throughout other quotes it shows that he isn't too hung up on technicalities but is really showing his humanity. 11/10

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 79 points 7 months ago

This is a good win, but this:

In his decision, he refuted several arguments presented by the state, including the claim that Ms. Wood using “Ms.” could “impede her job duties.” He found this assertion to be unfounded, noting instead that as a teacher, Ms. Wood's students achieved test scores higher than the district average.

This is a problem. It should not matter if Ms. Wood's students perform above or below average. The first amendment does not have qualifiers related to job performance. Even if she was a terrible teacher, that does not constitute a compelling interest in misgendering someone at work. The argument that it might affect her abilities to teach are wholly without merit, not because she is a good teacher, but because her gender is unrelated to her teaching.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 81 points 7 months ago

It might be splitting hairs here, but the judge isn't using that as a qualifier for his ruling, he's using it to refute FL's assertion. You're right that FL should lose automatically based on First Amendment reasons, but one of the criteria for filing an appeal is the probability of success on the merits. Demonstrating that FL's arguments are provably wrong helps to make the ruling more resistant to an appeal, should FL decide to appeal it.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago

Good.

Get fucked, fascists.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 months ago

Disney needs to eat up Ron Desantis in the next state election.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Fortunately, Caligula of the Peninsula is term limited as governor unless he wants to try again after four years.

But I think this primary showed how incredibly unlikable Lil' Boots is, even to people predisposed to authoritarians.

How bad is it though that a megacorp is a potential ally against this POS?

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Caligula of the Peninsula is term limited as governor

I'm surprised he hasn't instructed his cronies in the Florida Legislature to change that law yet.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I get no end of mirth from the notion of remembering how so many "True Conservatives" (TM), Enlightened Centrists(TM), "independents", (lol) and Never-Trumpers were lecturing me - and anyone else who were laughing and pointing at their grand pronouncements - about how ronnie was going to be the obvious shoe-in for the Republican primary because the Republicans were going to come to their senses because they have realized what a disaster donnie is and how he's not "really" a conservative, etc...

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Weird...a rational ruling in FL. I didn't think that was possible.

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

There are quite a lot of decent people here, some of them are judges. I will agree that we have above-averagely shitty governance, but we are trying to vote as hard as we can!

[-] gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

I can't even imagine the amount of bullshit that woman has to deal with, being trans person in Florida.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I think the radicalized right wing is hoping to make Floriduh as inhospitable as possible to normal people so that it stays red.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

That’s the scandal in all the red states that are in danger of becoming blue. They’re an ever shrinking minority of voters, and when they can’t gerrymander and suppress to tilt the numbers in their favor, they run all the liberals out of town so they can stay red.

Unfortunately, they also tend to be the fastest growing states, so this is unlikely to bite them in the ass any time soon.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
246 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1825 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS