222
submitted 7 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 153 points 7 months ago

While I'm glad he was awarded the judgement, it's wild that an undercover cop gets 23.5 million, while tons of civilians are also beaten by police and receive much lesser judgements, if they're lucky enough to get anything at all...

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What are you talking about? They receive plenty of pepper spray, rubber bullets, high pressure water, and sometimes even lead

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 7 months ago

Don't forget the espionage (dont bring your phones to a protest) and tear gas

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 31 points 7 months ago

Didn't you hear? NOT bringing your phone to a protest proves that you had malicious intent.

...Or, that's the argument of the prosecution in the Stop Cop City RICO cases in Atlanta. (Which, BTW, is being prosecuted by the state, since the Atlanta DA refused to press the case.)

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes because not wanting a valuable piece of equipment that is all but essential in modern society to get broken and leaving it elsewhere while you attend a gathering is just impossible.

Do these people even think before they speak, or do they actually think that's a valid argument?

I left my phone at home last time I went to a water park. I am a criminal who had bad intentions, better lock me up

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It doesn't have to valid, it just has to give them a flimsy excuse to violate your rights. It's not about justice it's about punishing people who speak up.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago

Ill say it im not glad he got a settlement. He knew what he was doing going undercover at a protest and it was likely 'try to entrap protestors'

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 7 months ago

Hopefully this case can be used as precedence going forward. Who the victim was shouldn't play a role there.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 125 points 7 months ago

How much did St. Louis pay out to normal people who were beaten by cops at protests?

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

That's my question too. I wouldn't say acab but way too many are and they get way too many preferential verdicts.

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 48 points 7 months ago

The money they waste on police lawsuits they could have ended homelessness, fed every child and buy me a 1985 IROC-Z. What a waste for losing your cool.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 41 points 7 months ago

As always, ACAB.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

The AP's shitty coverage doesn't even mention that the undercover cop who got severely beaten is black.

Cops beat a black undercover cop at a protest, because he was (a) black and (b) at a protest. Of course, cops routinely beat protesters, especially black protesters, but everyone who's beaten doesn't get a fat payout like this. Only cops, and only if they sue.

[-] Boinkage@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Fuck the police.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Disgusting. Paying out a class traitor plain clothes police instigator because his brother's in blue treated him like he treats everyone else.

I hope he has to look over his shoulder for the rest of his life.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
222 points (98.7% liked)

News

23388 readers
1452 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS