265
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] swiftcasty@kbin.social 46 points 2 years ago

The leotard in question is worn by the model on the far right who, even though she is cut off, visibly has her hands covering her groin area. Perhaps a re-design is in order?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

If you’re too embarrassed to stand still on stage with it, competing isn’t gonna go well

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Nike defended itself by noting that Team USA athletes not only have a choice between briefs and shorts but a wide variety of other outfit combinations. And the reigning Olympic pole vault champion, Katie Moon, criticized the notion that the uniforms are sexist. “Whether we feel best in a potato sack or a bathing suit during competitions, we should support the autonomy,” Moon, who is sponsored by Nike, wrote on Instagram.

Sounds to me like they can chose whatever cut they prefer. The outrage should be more directed at the advertisement choice than the actual product line.

[-] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago

Which is a very shitty take. If they advertised with a string tanga and those star-shaped things some stripers tape to their nipples, everyone would be upset as well (and rightfully so). It's not a matter of choice, the proposition itself is an insult.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Thong and tassles next time

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Go full ancient Greece and compete nude /s

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

NPR's article shows more people and a male athlete is also in skimpy bottoms and rocking the fig leaf hands.

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/15/1244773342/nike-team-usa-women-uniform-revealing-olympics

[-] sverit@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Looks more like shorts to me. You can see the Nike logo on the left thigh.

[-] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

In another photo, you can see that it's just shorts https://wwd.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DOM0116.jpg?w=1280

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

I can't be the only one to notice that Nike thinks that able women should be sexualized, but disabled ones should wear long pants. I'm not sure which women that is more insulting to.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

Both. Each side of that equation makes the other one worse

[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 years ago

There's no sexism on sport. Wtf are you talking about?!

/s just in case.

[-] ObsidianNebula@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago

What's going on with Nike and their uniforms? The MLB ones are pretty bad where you can basically see through the pants, and now this.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Gotta grift somewhere. Make that fabric shear so we use less and just call it "breathable" and "form fitted." And then charge em 3 times more.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

I doubt anyone at Nike is giving two shits about the fabric savings for the Olympic team uniforms lol

[-] TGTX@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Uniforms on the MLB side seem to be getting worse after the start of the season. There have been instances already of pants just ripping apart. Now, there have been sweat stain issues with the uniforms too. Some teams like the Mariners, Rangers, and Brewers are still waiting on full uniform sets. It’s been a chaotic mess.

[-] Otakulad@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Uniforms should be issued, not designed by the country. Some countries have invested $10,000s of dollars to ensure their athletes have the least amount of drag, namely in swimming. At that point, it isn't the talent of the athlete, it's the clothes. Put everyone on even playing ground clothes wise.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago

This would be my preference. The Olympic committee should put out a set of design and material guidelines, and each athlete can choose from that. That can have them printed with different patterns or whatever, but it must meet the guidelines. There should probably be several different shapes for "men" and "women" patterns that anyone can choose from any set.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The original Olympics were a bunch of greased up naked guys

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

They tied their foreskins shut so it was appropriate. (I'm not shitposting, Google it)

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

I hope they organize a "no shave" protest.

[-] Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I thought the same thing. The article mentions Brazilian waxes, and my immediate thought was f-that. Go full bush. You wanna see what my junk is really like? Feel free to view it in its natural state.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Girls are much more likely than boys to drop out of competitive sports. It’s little wonder when revealing kits are highlighted on the global stage

It’s likely more to do with pay and societal pressures

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Societal pressures like being sexy over being talented?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago

No, pressures to be a mom, take a quiet job, and be submissive

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
265 points (92.9% liked)

News

36384 readers
799 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS