198

Months after what critics have decried as a conservative takeover at New College of Florida, students and professors say a sense of confusion and anxiety looms over the start of fall semester in Sarasota, Florida.

Amy Reid, a member of the school’s Board of Trustees, said course options have dwindled after nearly 40% of faculty members have resigned.

Reid said the situation is quickly becoming “untenable.”

“Just before I came to this meeting, I received word that one more faculty member in biology is leaving,” she told CNN. “That’s going to make a challenge for students to complete their areas of studies here.”

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

Parents fucked around, kids will find out

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds about right. How long have the kids been being the ones punished for the parents shitty actions?

We used to live in a society that wanted the young to succeed and older individuals wanted the next generation to live better than they had.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably parents of other kids who wouldn't have gone to the former New College in the first place.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

NCF has an interesting history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_College_of_Florida I can see why it would be a target for right wing culture warriors. Equally important, I can see why it would look like a good substrate to give an intellectual veneer to right wing dogma.

Sucks for the current students, but the new administration will eventually be able to replace all of the faculty with conservative voices and get their "Hillsdale of the South." With the right funding, they'll be able to start their own slate of classical studies, intelligent design, and probably eugenics journals, and buid a body of peer reviewed academic research to support whatever god said. By 2027 there won't be any progressive students left to complain.

[-] notacat@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

How is it that Desantis can appoint six members of the board of trustees for a college?

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It is a state school. The board of trustees are state employees. It seems that they don't have any sort of tenure or term length. They got let go like any other at-will employee.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Conservatives proving that they can't manage anything once again.

If they can't manage a college, why the fuck should we ask them to manage a state or federal government??

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 16 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Once heralded as a progressive liberal arts school, New College of Florida has found itself at the center of the state’s culture war over education.

The new board has since voted to abolish diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and replaced the college’s former president with Richard Corcoran, the state’s former education commissioner.

At a board meeting earlier this month Spalding said the gender studies program was “more of an ideological movement than academic discipline.”

Ryan Terry, a spokesperson for the college, pointed to an increase in fall enrollment as a sign the school is appealing to more students.

New College said in a press release that it is currently housing some students in Sarasota-area hotels after a recent engineering report cited air quality concerns in the Pei residential complex.

“Out of an abundance of caution, and for the health and safety of the NCF community, Interim President Corcoran has made the decision to shutter all of the Pei dorms,” the press release said.


The original article contains 913 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 6 points 1 year ago

Mmm sweet sweet brain drain.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
198 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1752 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS