466
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 156 points 5 months ago

Weird... why is nobody commenting about how both parties are the same?

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 5 months ago

Oh that's easy, because this doesn't play into their narrative

Their goal is to stop people from voting this year so that the fascist can win

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 80 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It’s 1AM in Russia right now. Wait until morning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Lol. Right? It looks like the bots haven't gotten to this one yet

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

And so few ml posters! How odd!

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

The other party loudly proclaimed they don’t want this afaik so… or atleast associate themselves with that idea based on who they elect.

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

I wonder if that’ll make it legal for me to piss in the men’s bathroom again/have a job in the career I love and went thousands in debt to train for… only mentions students and they tend to forget that trans adults exist…

Oklahoma state law says it’s a misdemeanor and schools can lose up to 10% of their funding for letting anyone (teacher or student) use a bathroom that doesn’t match their birth certificate. (There’s been a standing executive order since 2015 that birth certificates cannot be changed). I have the face and body of a reddit neckbeard, but I was violating the law by not pissing in the same room as my female colleagues and students.

Just kinda messes with your head when you have to commit 1-3 crimes a day at work.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

I thought Title IX was about students though?

[-] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 months ago

It applies generally to anyone involved in a program receiving federal funding.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Yeah - that’s what I wondering. The law in Oklahoma says anyone in a public school. Our state department of education is controlled by Ryan Walters and LibsOfTikTok, so it’ll be interesting to see how they try to fight this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Just kinda messes with your head when you have to commit 1-3 crimes a day at work.

Those are rookie numbers!

...drink more water dude

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Part of teaching is peeing strategically - you have to plan your water drinking so that you only need to go during lunch or plan. (The worst is when they make you “cover” during your planning period - usually I could get away with sitting behind the desk and doing a subtle pee dance all hour)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 5 months ago

Lawsuit from Florida in 3... 2... 1...

[-] bouldering_barista@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

This is good news! Trans students will just be using the bathroom, cisgender students are the ones that may be abusing this with negative intentions.

Stay kind, everyone!

[-] ChokingHazard63@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago

Finally some good news for once

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Take that, Florida!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
466 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3695 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS