389
submitted 6 months ago by MRLimcon@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 203 points 6 months ago
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 59 points 6 months ago

The only appropriate response to have.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 122 points 6 months ago

During Supreme Court proceedings, HS. Phoolka, who represented the child advocacy groups, noted that Harish had constantly watched the video over the course of two years.

In case anyone thinks the ruling is actually about "accidental" downloads

[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.social 114 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it's not even just a sensationalist headline. It's what they ruled. How are we supposed to reconcile this with the rest of the world? I'm genuinely asking. How do you include a country with leadership like this in the future of the world? Someone enlighten me.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

A more important headline is that there currently are not laws in place to outlaw the possession and viewing of child pornography. It shouldn’t be up to the court to set a precedent of its illegality, but rather a clear law making it illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lath@kbin.earth 10 points 6 months ago

... In good company.

No trouble at all if everyone else is doing it. I mean, it's not like only Epstein had an island...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 90 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So let me get this straight. My county banned most of the popular porn sites because of the negative influence it can have on the populace but has such a poorly written and enforced law that people who possess and watch CSAM are deemed to be not breaking the law. What the actual fuck is going on here. This is a dangerous precedent being set here and I can only hope that supreme court overrules the case and holds the guy guilty.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 37 points 6 months ago

So, apparently the only porn allowed is featuring minors?

How the hell can they justify this

[-] sheilzy@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Remember to vote against BJP. India has a beautiful culture and a lot of the Indian students I met in college were really amiable, thoughtful people, but BJP is ruining it.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 80 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Calm down. Have some cow urine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 6 months ago

100% chance the high court judge has this exact content on his computer.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Who will judge the judges?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago

Everyday my country finds a new way to be regressive.

Hopefully I can leave it as early as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

matt gaetz buying plane tickets there as we speak

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 40 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The defendant claimed that the CSAM had auto-downloaded after he received it through the popular messaging app WhatsApp, which his attorneys maintained is not a criminal offense under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses (POCSO) Act and the Information Technology (IT) Act.

...Which, okay, makes sense that you wouldn't be guilty. It would be like when people were airdropping shit a few years ago (is that still a thing?) and people were unwittingly getting pictures of someone else's penis. The didn't ask for or go looking for pictures of someone's penis, it was served to them without their intent or desire. The defendant's argument is that he didn't download these, they were sent to him and his phone automatically downloaded them. Is that true? IDK. But i it is true, then he didn't have criminal intent.

But moving along...

Rampant porn consumption has long been considered a major social problem in India, with multiple incidents occurring over the past few years involving sexual violence against women and girls motivated by pornography.

"Sexual violence [...] motivated by pornography". That is... Not a thing. Porn doesn't make people commit violent crimes. If anything, porn availability and consumption appears to decrease sexual assaults.

In one of the most shocking cases from 2021, a 6-year-old was beaten to death after refusing to replicate sex acts with a group of boys who were addicted to porn.

Porn addiction is also not a thing. Outside of religious and moral crusaders, you won't hear the phrase. Psychologists that specialize in human sexuality do not refer to porn addiction. When you look at the background of the people talking about porn "addiction" in the US, it always goes back to religion and morality, not clinical research.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Porn addiction is also not a thing. Outside of religious and moral crusaders, you won't hear the phrase. Psychologists that specialize in human sexuality do not refer to porn addiction. When you look at the background of the people talking about porn "addiction" in the US, it always goes back to religion and morality, not clinical research.

I was interested if this holds up and unfortunately it is a thing in the medical world, albeit not a big one. I found this study, which gives a good overview over the topic.

I'll quote the whole Introduction, because I find it quite interesting and it gives a good overview.

spoiler

With the inclusion of “Gambling Disorder” in the “Substance Use and Addictive Disorders” chapter of the DSM-5 [1], the APA publicly acknowledged the phenomenon of behavioral addiction. Furthermore, “Internet Gaming Disorder” was placed in Section 3—conditions for further study.

This represents the ongoing paradigm shift in the field of addictions that relates to addictive behavior, and paves the way for new research in the light of cultural changes caused by the new technologies.

There is apparently an existing common neurobiological [2] and environmental [3] ground between the varying addictive disorders, including both substance abuse and addictive behavior; this can manifest as an overlapping of both entities [4].

Phenomenologically, behaviorally addicted individuals frequently exhibit a problematic consumption model: impaired control (e.g., craving, unsuccessful attempts to reduce the behavior), impairment (e.g., narrowing of interests, neglect of other areas of life), and risky use (persisting intake despite awareness of damaging psychological effects). Whether these behaviors also meet physiological criteria relating to addiction (tolerance, withdrawal) is more debatable [4,5,6].

Hypersexual disorder is sometimes considered one of those behavioral addictions. It is used as an umbrella construct that encompasses various problematic behaviors (excessive masturbation, cybersex, pornography use, telephone sex, sexual behavior with consenting adults, strip club visitations, etc.) [7]. Its prevalence rates range from 3% to 6%, though it is difficult to determine since there is not a formal definition of the disorder [8,9].

The lack of robust scientific data makes its research, conceptualization, and assessment difficult, leading to a variety of proposals to explain it, but is usually associated with significant distress, feelings of shame and psychosocial dysfunction [8], as well as other addictive behaviors [10] and it warrants direct examination.

Concurrently, the rise of the new technologies has also opened up a pool of problematic addictive behavior, mainly Internet Addiction. This addiction may focus on a specific application on the internet (gaming, shopping, betting, cybersex…) [11] with potential for risk-addictive behavior; in this case, it would act as a channel for concrete manifestations of said behavior [4,12]. This means inevitable escalation, providing new outlets for established addicts as well as tempting people (due to increased privacy, or opportunity) who would not have previously engaged in these behaviors.

Online pornography use, also known as Internet pornography use or cybersex, may be one of those Internet-specific behaviors with a risk for addiction. It corresponds to the use of Internet to engage in various gratifying sexual activities [13], among which stands the use of pornography [13,14] which is the most popular activity [15,16,17] with an infinite number of sexual scenarios accessible [13,18,19,20]. Continued use in this fashion sometimes derives in financial, legal, occupational, and relationship trouble [6,21] or personal problems, with diverse negative consequences. Feelings of loss of control and persistent use despite these adverse results constitute “online sexual compulsivity” [22] or Problematic Online Pornography Use (POPU). This problematic consumption model benefits from the “Triple A” factors [23].

Due to this model, pornography-related masturbation may be more frequent nowadays, but this is not necessarily a sign of pathology [21]. We know that a considerable proportion of young male population access Internet for pornography consumption [24,25]; in fact, it is one of their key sources for sexual health [26]. Some have expressed concern about this, addressing the time gap between when porn material is consumed for the first time ever, and an actual first sexual experience; specifically, how the former can have an impact on sexual development [27] like abnormally low sexual desire when consuming online pornography [28] and erectile dysfunction, which has spiked dramatically among young men in the past few years when compared to a couple decades ago [29,30,31,32,33].

We systematically reviewed the existing literature on the subject of POPU to try and summarize the various recent advances made in terms of epidemiology, clinical manifestations, neurobiological evidence that supports this model of problematic use, its diagnostic conceptualization in relation to hypersexual disorder, its proposed assessment instruments and treatment strategies.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 39 points 6 months ago

I mean…

looks at sexual assault rates in india

…yep, par for the course. Guess which country will be uninhabitable by 2040-2050s too.

Don’t need to be a racist about it, but just know that problem will not just go away and will require robust infrastructure and strong mental health care to handle properly.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 6 months ago

There's always the chance they'll end up starting a nuclear war with Pakistan. I wouldn't put it past Modi to nuke India.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 38 points 6 months ago

Gandhi always nukes first

[-] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 6 months ago

I thought it might just have been about a badly worded law, but no, at least from the translation given, the law seems pretty clear, and the opinion from the court seems extremely strange.

[-] SGG@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

They, or someone they know, most likely sitting on gb's of the stuff.

[-] tearsintherain@leminal.space 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

India has been taken over by backwards-ass right wing religious fundamentalists.

India "became the world leader in internet blackouts", straight up government control. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/25/a-tool-of-political-control-how-india-became-the-world-leader-in-internet-blackouts?

Horrific violence covered up in Manipur on the minority christian community. The country is sliding into some barbaric behavior. https://www.wired.com/story/internet-shutdown-manipur-burning-in-the-dark/

Since May 4, the Indian government has shut off the internet in Manipur, giving cover to murders, rapes, and arson.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tearsintherain@leminal.space 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Madras High Court Judge N. Anand Venkatesh also noted that it was “done in privacy without affecting or influencing anyone else.”

ummm, how about the child sexual abuse victim? bad enough the misogyny and oppression of women's rights that comes with right wing religion everywhere, RSS/BJP certainly playing their part. the child dude, think of the child.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

The Supreme Court of India’s debate on child pornography’s potential semi-legalization comes amid an ongoing debate in the nation regarding the criminal status of marital rape. According to Supreme Court Observer, a decision is currently pending to determine if marital rape will be made legal in the country, as it is currently not considered a crime in situations where the raped “wife” is not a minor.

Yeah, no. Fuck this country and every single person who stands by this shit.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's entirely possible most people live in a jurisdiction with similar laws. I'm not saying it's good, but I'm saying this is Earth and you can only set your standards for evil so high.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago

Every day I learn something new about contemporary India, I turn a little more dissapointed.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Won't somebody think of the powerful?

/s

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

And just like that, India got a bunch of shady business/tourism. I doubt it was an accidental or unintentional decision.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

weird how fascists consistently do this shit. Or maybe its not given how often they like to exert power over people who they see as lessers.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago

Well, that's disappointing...

[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Seriously India?

[-] Cornpop@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

India superpower 2020

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
389 points (97.6% liked)

World News

38955 readers
2077 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS