197
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Officials at Columbia University, facing surging tensions on campus that raised safety concerns, have announced all classes will be virtual on Monday as Passover begins.

Columbia President Minouche Shafik said in a statement the decision was made to “deescalate the rancor and give us all a chance to consider next steps.”

The move underscores how tense the situation has become at the Ivy League school and the enormous challenge facing Shafik to get the situation under control.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 206 points 7 months ago

Wowza, they actually went through that whole article without mentioning that the university ordered an NYPD raid on student protesters last week and issued suspensions against a bunch of them.

But, no, that couldn't have anything to do with these increased tensions, it's definitely 100% because this is the first day of Passover /s

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

I noticed it’s being framed as an “enormous challenge for Shafik”. Bleh.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

CNN writing Zionist propaganda? Who'd have thought

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 41 points 7 months ago

This is why you don't commit war crimes: it puts your whole diaspora I'm danger.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

While it shouldn't be on them, the diaspora could shift its position and join the protests against the war crimes. Break the Israel-Jew connection semites and antisemites are drawing for their respective purposes. I bet this would decrease antisemitism and improve its safety dramatically.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

While I don't disagree with the concept at all here, I'm a little uneasy over the idea that anyone would have to do anything to go out of the way for their own safety, especially taking up a political cause. That should be the default

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 25 points 7 months ago

I’m a little uneasy over the idea that anyone would have to do anything to go out of the way for their own safety

What's interesting, or awful, is that was exactly what was being asked of Palestinian and Middle Eastern diaspora members: that they hadn't disavowed Hamas (or ISIS, or going back to 2001, Al Qaeda) enough and were suspect until they did.

It was so bad that we saw joke headlines like "Palestinian children killed in Israeli strike criticised for not condemning Hamas".

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No question. Unfortunately some folks would go out of their way to endanger the safety of others, whether they like it or not. If I've learned anything about democracy and society it's that passive stability (in safety and other regards) seems impossible. Some people have to be actively working to maintain such stability. If you have a well funded government that represents your interests, then public servants will do most of this work, you just go and vote. If you don't... more of that work gets outsourced to private individuals. And since there always are private individuals who are working towards replacing, underfunding, undermining governments, it follows that even if you have such a government that is favorable to protect you, you still have to work to counteract those other folks.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Jewish groups have been protesting the whole time. Fuck, before all this it was Jewish folks who introduced me to anti Zionism. In late October I had to hear a whole thing about the crackdown against Jewish pro Palestine protesters in New York and how the media keeps ignoring them or brushing aside the fact that some of these protests are Jewish led. (I was at a party hosted by a Jewish anti Zionist friend the day after a Jewish anti Zionist protest in central station was broken up) In fact Israel had to crack down against Israeli protestors arguing for peace and a measured response.

This is not Jews vs Palestinians or Jews vs Muslims. This is Israel (the government and a significant portion of their citizens) and their supporters against the people of Palestine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

Honestly, a lot of people are. But the big groups, like AIPAC and the ADL, are pretty heavily pro-Israel.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

As if the bigots would update their lists of who to hate lol

[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

That's such a great point. I never thought about that.

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

So nice for the school to make classes virtual so you can go out and protest while listening to lecture.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

It’s all just a bunch of religious nonsense.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Nah, this is about the theft of land, destruction of property, and some super evil fucks trying to enrich themselves at the expense of an oppressed people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Columbia made a Pantheon building?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
197 points (92.6% liked)

News

23376 readers
1808 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS