I find this question a little weird, because open source software (which includes the Fediverse) was already a very political movement from the beginning.
As for organizing, since there is no main authority or philosophy beyond make software open, it's up to you and like-minded individuals to use the space as you seem fit.
As others have alluded to here... the idea of internet activism as a political movement kinda burned itself out with the rise and fall of the Pirate Party; at least for most of western Europe.
Lots of interesting lessons learned can be drawn from that if such a thing were to be ever attempted again, but at least for now the Fediverse remains solidly in the "infrapolitics" space. We have a community about this here: https://slrpnk.net/c/infrapolitics
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !infrapolitics@slrpnk.net
This community link doesn’t work for me (Memmy user).
These links only work if someone from your instance has previously subscribed to that community. With small communities on small instance that is often not the case.
I think its really a pity that the pirate party lost its steam, because it was left and also really anti-authoritarian (at least I think). However, I think the Fediverse could become political or at least societal really relevant, because I think there is a strong interrelation between how our social networks are build, therefore how we act in them and from that how we act as social beings in general. I think federated social networks could have a positive effect here and also maybe give the pirate party some steam again.
The Fediverse is political, it just isn't directly represented by a political party or similar movement with political ambitions.
In a way that is good, because it allows us to slowly shift the Overton window etc instead of becoming a target of polarization and political manipulation like the PP did.
Thanks for the link, looks interesting
No
Fediverse is diverse. We're not a united group with the same political preference. I don't see that happening.
No.
Developers of opensource software have been coordinating around complex problems for decades. I don't think lemmy or mastodon can contribute much to that.
I don't see why the fediverse needs to be co-opted into any particular political ideology. All political interests are free to create their own instances and / or use the fediverse as they wish. I don't think it's any more suited to left-libertarian than any other ideology.
I also don't see the fediverse being a "new landscape". The majority of people will always gravitate towards well funded corporate platforms. I would be really happy with the fediverse staying as it is now, I mean of course everyone is free to join but if it became the new normal then I'd have to find somewhere else to spend my time.
All decentralized networks and ways of organizing efforts (such as FOSS) are structurally left-libertarian as that is an politician ideology that describes such as the proposed way of organizing our society. It is literally the same.
Sure, the results of our combined structural and decentralized efforts can be temporarily abused by people not in favour of such means, but as long as they are using them it means we are ultimately winning.
Honestly? I think it will eventually be astroturfed by corporations and bad actors once it gets big enough.
God I hope not
Meta comment: Interesting difference in tone of the replies here and on lemmy.world... makes if clear again that attempts to "merge" Lemmy communities on superficial names like "fediverse" are mis-guided at best.
Proprietary software and free software are both highly political choice, not sure whether the fediverse will change something. Unfortunately, many left wing politician still choose to use twitter/facebook and so on
Wasn’t there a pirate party some time ago?
still is.
No
Absolutely not.
Almost certainly not. Just not enough people in it, and the decentralization also works against that to a degree.
Can you describe left libertarian?
Anarchism (look it up). Same as the original meaning of just "libertarian", before the far-right in the US successfully took over the term for their version of laissez faire capitalism.
Democratic socialism is also considered left libertarian as well.
I mean okay why not but why not call a cat a cat? Especially when the term have been hijacked by USA fachos?
Wouldn't that make people think we're supporting fachos and not cats?
I meant: call yourselves anarchists.
There's not much debate to what it means IMO, or if it is, there can be a healthy debate/explanation about it.
"Liberal" not so much.
Libertarian has another meaning outside of the American Libertarian Party.
Yep, so tell me the definition if you'd please?
Seems like "libertarian" means asshole for most people, which is probably not what you mean.
No I don't think so. It will probably stay a small niche platform for enthousiasts.
I can't see lemmygrad uniting with lemmy.world, not in a million decades. Not in traditional political stuff at least, they both support FOSS at least. (except one of them censors piracy instances but oh well)
defederation isnt censorship. Can we please not ape the right in crying censorship every time someone chooses not to boost someone elses message
Fediverse won't do what the people lack the courage to do.
We already have it, it is called the Free Software Movement. It was started with the GNU project many decades ago
No.
A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".
Getting started on Fediverse;