229

College administrators are falling into a tried and true trap laid by the right (theconversation.com)

submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 97 points 7 months ago

The Right Wing is really good at working the refs, and the Left needs to catch a Clue: they're going to get called radical socialist Marxist communist anarchists no matter what they do, so they should get off the knees, stop being such appeasers and fight.

Own the label

[-] hark@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

Democrats are not the left.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

I didn't see a mention of democrats.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

The left isn't afraid of being called "radical socialist Marxist communist anarchists" so I assumed they were talking about democrats who are.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

Democrats are not the ones out there protesting for Palestine.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Right, the protesters aren't being "appeasers", they're fighting. It's the democrats who are being appeasers and afraid of being called "radical socialist Marxist communist anarchists" so my conclusion is that they were talking about democrats.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Ooohh that's what you meant. Haha. Thanks for the context!

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 7 months ago

What do they mean "trap laid by the right". These college administrators are conservatives.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

So when "leftists" in office are calling for ending "antisemtic" protests on campus, does that make them part of the right?

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Those people aren't leftists obviously. They're likely liberals

[-] Dearth@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

What evidence is there that college administrators are leftists?

[-] Potatofish@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

In my book, I plug every outlet. Please buy my book!

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

They mention it once in the whole article? But that’s half the stuff on The Conversation. No different from interviews on most news programs

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Tin soldiers and Nixon's coming

[+] ZK686@lemmy.world -82 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Silly. The Right isn't doing anything...people in general are getting fed up. USC cancelled their graduation, imagine being a 4 year student who didn't get to celebrate a graduation in 2020, and now they can't in college? It's getting ridiculous and these "protests" are starting to effect normal people...

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 43 points 7 months ago

They cancelled graduation after they banned the commencement speaker from speaking. Nobody made them do any of this.

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Just imagine if they had done nothing. Just let the students talk and let the speech happen. There wouldn't have been a big deal about it. Some people would have been offended sure but they can get over it. Just like everyone else gets over things that bothers them. Instead they made it a big deal so they could feel powerful over the kids. Must suck to be so much older than them and be so completely wrong.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, you can't go around letting people just say whatever they want. Badspeak is called badspeak for a reason.

[-] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 30 points 7 months ago

normal people who don't want to be inconvenienced by genocide on the planet. I would call that an apathetic asshole but hey it's your internal narrative right.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 29 points 7 months ago

"forget the genocide, what about these poor kids who are gonna miss ANOTHER graduation ceremony?!?!"

[+] ZK686@lemmy.world -12 points 7 months ago

Oh brother....here we go.. because THAT'S the responsibility of Americans right? WE NEED TO DO MORE FOR EVERYONE ELSE!!!

"The US needs to stop getting involved in everyone's business" - Sincerely, The World.

"The US needs to do more to get involved in everyone's business" Sincerely, The World.

I swear...people want the US to be the international police until they don't...

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lmao I'm pretty sure the main argument is for the US to stop sending billions in aid and weapons to Israel (and in this case, for Columbia to not invest in Israel)

US support is the only way it's survived this long, so really we'd like them to be less of the world police.

[+] ZK686@lemmy.world -12 points 7 months ago

Israel is our biggest ally in the Middle East. They literally are our extension in an area that hates America and will stop at nothing to kill us. These "protestors" have no idea how imperative it is that we support Israel because without support, they'd get invaded, slaughtered, and wiped out by the countries surrounding them. The whole point of Israel was to create a home for Jewish people, so that they'd have somewhere to call home if anything like the Holocaust were to ever happen again.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 7 months ago

Lmao I wonder why anyone around there hates America....

Also I'm sure they found a home for them somewhere where nobody else was or at least moved in peacefully with a joint administration right

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Preventing geanocide with more genocide.
The tragedy of the Holocaust was the death, not the enthnicity of the slain.
They lost the plot, and so have our leaders.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 17 points 7 months ago

affect

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

Guess they missed their college graduation where you learn the difference between "effect" and "affect".

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024

229 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers

1835 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News