809

The “Readers added context” feature is the only good thing about Twitter.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 year ago

Bro I love that Twitter's fact checker is just so fuckin petty to Elon lmao

[-] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 82 points 1 year ago

I’m surprised he hasn’t got rid of it yet. Maybe he has to have it in order to keep his few remaining advertisers?

[-] phatskat@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

The thing is, it’s usually long enough after his comments have had their impact that these additions are made. It’s really his having/eating cake feature. He can say some out and out false shit, it gets picked up by his base and spread, the community mod a day or two later goes “actually”, and if someone calls him out he can just say “oh but the community mod set things right” if he doesn’t just outright ignore it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Uprise42@artemis.camp 30 points 1 year ago

Is this legit? That isn’t just ironic, but that last line is racists as hell. I mean, I’m fairly certain he’s racist if this is real or not but that last part was just so explicit in it

[-] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 27 points 1 year ago

I think (I hope) the last line is from a completely different post, not a reply to the black woman. Tbh I thought it must have been a reply to someone with an NFT chimp avatar. It’s much nicer here in my naïve/sheltered mind than the real world 😕

[-] sfgifz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

It's a different post/thread - you can tell from the time lines with the chimp one being made in 2018. However, no idea what the context of that was, and I'm not going to use Xitter to find out.

[-] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

it has to be because if he actually blocked her she wouldn't be able to reply to his tweets anymore

[-] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It's not a reply to the black woman. I don't think Musk is dumb enough to say "chimp" to a black person in public, but I have been proven wrong before.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

I think she’s attaching his chimp comment in her reply as a way of displaying his hypocrisy.

But I’m not sure. I’ve never used Twitter and always find the screenshots stupid to read.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Can someone ELI5 what is the "Readers added context" feature?

[-] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I haven’t added one myself, but this is my understanding: all Twitter users can opt into the community notes feature but at first you can only rate notes as helpful or unhelpful. Once you’ve rated 5 notes you have the ability to write your own. You can do so on any tweet, but if your note(s) don’t get enough “helpful” ratings, you lose your ability to write them. You have to go back to rating notes - once you’ve rated 5 more you can write again.

When you add a note you chose a reason why you’re adding it, similar to explaining why you’re reporting a comment on lemmy. If you say that the original tweet is misleading you have to say why and provide a source. It only shows on the tweet to everyone if you get enough “helpful” ratings from the people who have opted into the scheme.

Not very EILI5 but you get the jist!

[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks, now I understand this better... And yeah this dude is a real jerk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lasagna@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't be surprised if this is just yet another genius move for introducing blocks as a paid feature.

[-] mind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Blocking on Twitter is not the same thing as blocking on lemmy.

Twitter has a "mute" feature that is equivalent to the feature lemmy has. That mute feature is staying.

Lemmy let's you hide all of a users posts by blocking them, but that block does not prevent them from commenting for others to see. On Twitter, it did.

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why are people arguing about whether blocking on Lemmy is better or hypocritical or whatever? I'm pretty sure this post is just about Elon being a hypocrite, and is saying absolutely nothing about Lemmy

[-] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

I really don’t know. But I’ve had to give multiple warnings, a temporary ban and a permanent ban already so I really hope we can just stick to enjoying musk being called out and not argue over irrelevant/nonexistent issues.

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

I second that.

[-] geekworking@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Am I following the thread correctly in that he is calling a black girl a chimp?

[-] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, he’s not quite that horrific (in public). A few of us discussed it in this thread.

Edit: I think I messed the link up. Try this.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No the girl is showing a screenshot of his tweet where he blocked someone, nested inside her tweet, in response to him saying that blocking makes no sense. .

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

I'm kinda having hard time understanding this. Bypassing blocks in Twitter was always so trivial, essentially same as mute. Just open the profile on another account or incognito.

Official twitter app even supports multiple accounts by default.

Only way to actually prevent unwanted people from interacting with you was to make your profile private so you can approve every follower individually.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

How old is this conversation?

I don’t expect Elon to have the various store policies memorized, but shouldn’t an employee be aware of this shit? Why is he being schooled by users?

Maybe he fired the “policy advisor”, too.

[-] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

It’s 3 days old. You joke, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he fired the policy advisors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sfgifz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

but shouldn’t an employee be aware of this shit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

The “if blocking is removed the app will be in violation of play store and App Store policies” is 100% wrong though, I’m surprised that note hasn’t been removed.

People incorrectly saw the section saying that the developers of the app have to have a way to block certain users from using the app - like say users that have been account banned by google/apple - as saying that users have to be able to block other users.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
809 points (97.6% liked)

Murdered by Words

3 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS