25
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ryan213@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Not taking away some of the achievement but he had a head start. They were already contenders plus a huge spending spree.

[-] idkwhatimdoing@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I was going to pop in with the same thought. Even still, looking at those numbers, going 200 for 269 is crazy. New coach or not, that's gotta be among the best runs/rates for any team in history.

[-] auriken@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

there's only a 10 game difference between the greats at #2 thru #4, while there is a 200 game difference from #4 and #5, 53 games less from Pep is still huge

[-] Ryan213@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Definitely, it's a huge achievement.

[-] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Add a big asterisk to this with a footnote, just like everything else City have achieved over the last years.

[-] Strae@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe a stupid question, but does it count if he wasn't there for the game? A player wouldn't get credit for a win if they didn't play, so should the manager get credit for the win if he wasn't managing the game?

In Pep we trust.

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was surprised that Klopp hasn't reached 200 wins, can possibly quicker than Sir Alex but seems hard https://www.premierleague.com/managers/5119/J%C3%BCrgen-Klopp/overview

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
25 points (82.1% liked)

Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5628 readers
1 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS