48
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Just in time! /s

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Because it's more expensive, not because it's worse for the environment. Still a good step though. I hope they can phase out gas next, since it's arguably worse for ghg emissions. But it looks like it's massively ramping up not down.

[-] besbin@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 months ago

I will trust it when I see it. The track record of the G7 in solving global warming is atrocious.

[-] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

So they'll just start shoveling wood into coal power plants in 2030 and unfurl the "Mission Accomplished" banner.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

We’ve replaced coal with “clean coal(tm)”! It’s totally different, trust us.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)

Futurology

1760 readers
90 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS