174

Sword-wielding man attacks passersby in London, killing a 14-year-old boy and injuring 4 others (apnews.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 43 points 10 months ago

Guys come on, a fucking kid was murdered. At least try to be respectful.

[-] illi@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't want to undercut the tragedy of lost life here, but I pity people doing HEMA fencing or similar hobbies in UK.

As I understand it the government was already stupid about some anti-sword/knife laws and this won't help...

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Swords are already pretty regulated in the UK last I learnt about this topic. Matt Easton from Schola Gladiatoria has a video on it somewhere

[-] illi@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, Matt Easton is why I know about it. My point being, if they were paranoid about swords before, what will they do now

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

True

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 18 points 10 months ago

They got the attacker alive at least. He's in for a bad time.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Good.

[-] wjrii@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

King Charles III said his thoughts and prayers were with the family of the young victim, and he saluted the courage of emergency workers, Buckingham Palace said.

"King Charles III" still sounds so weird to me. The last story I ran across with his name in it was about either Ireland or Scotland, I can't remember which, and it took me longer than I care to admit to realize it wasn't some sly Jacobite comment.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

What the fuck man.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 13 points 10 months ago

I thought cops wearing chainmail was ridiculous, but maybe London police should have something like this:

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago

It's about as ridiculous as wearing plate carriers against firearms.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

A sword, Mal!

[-] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

How weird is that?

[-] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

I haven't thought of this in ages, thank you.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

Oh look! Another mass shooting in Amer-

[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 10 months ago

What kind of sword?

[-] ChuggingPus@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

Samurai.

[+] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -50 points 10 months ago

See! SWORDS also kill people! Even though he could have killed that entire boys family plus a couple more with a gun, I DON'T CARE! PRO LIFE!

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 40 points 10 months ago

Please keep your Murica shit in Murica. Thank you.

[-] louisinidus@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I feel like he was being sarcastic

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago

Irrelevant.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

is it, though?

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago

It's stupid Murica shit either way, so yes, it is.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I'd venture a guess the majority of users here are American and just trying to solve our stupid American shit.

If you don't care, then just ignore. If you do care about reducing deaths in America, then let these conversations play out.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago

Posting some polemic kneejerk reactionary comments about Murica in threads that are not about America is not going to reduce deaths in America. It only derails the actual topic with Americentrism that other people will just perceive as rude.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My guy, how do you think peoples' opinions on national issues shift over the years...?

... The answer: By the aggregation of conversations like this. Connecting dots to parallel events to exemplify what could've been — what other time is a viable time to have that conversation, at the dinner table...?

There really is nothing wrong here; there really is nothing rude here. The user is using satire and sarcasm to indicate that UK has more fruitful laws than America. if anything, it's raising UK up and pointing out our stupid American shit. This is a public forum well within the rules — again, what is wrong with that?

The only thing I can conceive is that there are pro-gun folks on here who'd rather suppress this dialogue. They are quite literally the only ones who would object to not having the uncomfortable conversation about firearms in America and saving lives.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io -1 points 10 months ago

This has nothing to do with parallel events since the UK and the US have vastly different laws & regulations (or lack thereof). And Americans constantly - and I really mean constantly - trying to interject their own politics into foreign topics that has nothing to do with them, trying to make the topic about them, is nothing but annoying at this point.

The only thing I can conceive is that there are pro-gun folks on here who'd rather suppress this dialogue.

Then you're simply tone deaf because there's not a whole lot of pro-gun folks in Europe either. But keep on making your own shit up with whatever mental gymnastics you need to make yourself feel better in reaffirming your little confirmation bias. This is, unfortunately, just proving my point though, since you completely ignore what I'm saying and continue to try to make this about you.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This has nothing to do with parallel events since the UK and the US have vastly different laws & regulations (or lack thereof).

Yes, that is precisely my point — can't you see? Let me attempt to spell it out:

- A parallel event occurs in the UK that is common in the US: a mass casualty homicidal rampage.
- We (what we learn in English composition) Compare-and-Contrast in order to learn
- We take what we've compared-and-contrasted, and we improve.

What you seem to suggest is that comparing and contrasting is off-limits on public forums for some inane reason.

And Americans constantly - and I really mean constantly - trying to interject their own politics into foreign topics that has nothing to do with them, trying to make the topic about them, is nothing but annoying at this point.

For better or worse, Americans have a massive influence on the world stage. We are the Rome of this era. What happens in America often impacts the globe, again for better or worse. Considering this is an open community that has many Americans on here, I fail to see the issue. Like, why are you so hellbent on suppressing a conversation about improving something for Americans? This has zero impact on what happens in the UK; we're simply contrasting experiments in other countries to see what works, and what doesn't.

This is all in the name of improvement, and I'll be damned if anyone tries to suggest there's something taboo about that.

This is, unfortunately, just proving my point though, since you completely ignore what I’m saying and continue to try to make this about you.

Again, your opening sentence outright proves you are completely ignoring my point.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 0 points 10 months ago

This has devolved to Shit Americans Say and is definitely too dense for me wanting to continue. Have a nice day.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Fair enough, you as well.

[-] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 5 points 10 months ago

"Thoughts and prayers" seems to have crossed the pond. I genuinely hope they are more useful over there, because they are absolutely worthless here and usually indicate that nothing of consequence will be done about the matter.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Hmm almost as if, swords, like guns, are weapons made to kill things.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I'd rather be shot than killed with a sword, tbh.

[+] lennybird@lemmy.world -7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Either everyone got whooshed by your sarcasm and underlying point or there are more gun lubbers on here than I thought.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I don't think so, the comment is just a little tone deaf to the tragedy.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If anyone directly subjected to the tragedy were here I might be inclined to agree, but this isn't the funeral. So personally I think it's a great time to connect the dots between this event, and what could've been had the lethal effectiveness of the shooter been elevated. With the goal in mind to mitigate future tragedies, I see nothing tone deaf about it. I see it as very productive.

I mean really, what else are we supposed to talk about in these comments...?

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Nah, talking about it is fine. It's how they did it. I don't give a shit either way, I was just making an observation.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

What was wrong with how they said it?

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024

174 points (97.8% liked)

World News

42553 readers

1832 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world