143
submitted 1 year ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Pssshhhh dummies. There's no wind on the moon.

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

There's a wind on moon museum.
Wait, er, air in space.
I'll come in again.

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

That is such a cool launch pad

[-] _finger_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of Thunderbirds GO!

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

What is up with all these moon missions lately? First Russia, then India, now Japan.

[-] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

It's the cool retro thing all the kids are doing these days.

The 60s are in again.

[-] jcit878@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

moon, so hot right now

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Launches got really cheap recently.

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

Earth's fucked. Accelerating plans to advance technology so we can fuck up another planet.

And "we", I am mean "them". The wealthy and their servants.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Earth is not fucked, but having a proper moon base makes key technologys a necessity, like really large scale co2 scrubbers. Also, the moon is basically a new gold mine for Helium-3, which is going to be very important in the future.

Having large scale co2 scrubbers makes a huge difference on earth as well.

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Helium-3 is a fuel for fusion that does have its benefits, but most scientists are focused on Deuterium-Tritium reactions. On the moon, the most concentrated regolith has only 50 parts of helium-3 per billion. That is super sparse. Like, we may as well be sifting uranium out of Earth's oceans at that point. And if we're doing giant space-based megaprojects, the gas giants probably have higher concentrations of helium-3 or we could just beam power around from giant solar panels.

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This is a fair argument against Elon Musk's dream to colonize Mars - it is indeed an escapist fantasy. But with the recent and upcoming moon missions, the involved parties (government orgs!) are quite clear that they're not doing it out of a false belief that they can make a self-sustaining colony. That stuff is over a century away. Only billionaires and their simps believe it lol.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Progress doesn't start at settling on other planets. Gotta start to refine the technology ssomewhere.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

pluto is a planet

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Scrubs are cheaper than booms!

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tokyo-based startup ispace’s (9348.T) lunar lander Hakuto-R Mission 1 failed in April.

JAXA was planning to start SLIM’s moon landing in January-February 2024 after Monday's launch, aiming to follow the success of India's Chandrayaan-3 lunar exploration mission this month.

The rocket was also carrying an X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM) satellite, a joint project of JAXA, NASA and the European Space Agency.

H-IIA, jointly developed by JAXA and MHI, has been Japan's flagship space launch vehicle, with a success rate of 98% since 2001.

However, after JAXA's new medium-lift H3 rocket failed on its debut in March, the agency postponed the launch of H-IIA No.

Japan's recent space-related efforts have faced other setbacks, with the launch failure of the Epsilon small rocket in October 2022, followed by an engine explosion during a test last month.


The original article contains 279 words, the summary contains 136 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I like to think this was playing until the last second before they made that decision

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=4u6V6UisBz8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
143 points (96.1% liked)

World News

32291 readers
831 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS