102
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 78 points 6 months ago

Stop funding Israel’s genocide seems like an easy sensible option. That’s kinda straightforward

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

But…. But, we can’t do that!

it’s a antisemitic to not fund genocide! The genocidal maniac said so.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

He's in a lose/lose situation now.

He can keep supporting Israel and lose the support of the younger voters he so desperately needs.

OR:

He can reverse course, let Bibi twist in the wind, causing him to lose all support from the pro-Israel lobby, and be met with "yeah, but you didn't do it soon enough" from the younger voters.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

Third option is: you're misusing our armaments, and we won't give you more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

I’m pretty sure the youth is more receptive to not funding genocide with tax dollars than you make it out to seem

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I just want to point out the latter has been a narrative for decades and "younger voters" just keep getting older with it. It's also completely hypothetical because listening to anyone younger than Boomers hasn't been tried.

I'm in my 40s, I vote reliably, I voted for Biden in 2020 to give him a chance. As long as Biden is continuing to ship weapons to Israel I won't be voting for him again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 6 months ago

We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas!

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Someone tell Biden there is actually a really easy solution.

Stop arms exports to israel.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Jesus tapdancing christ there’s a TRIVIAL fucking solution right the fuck in front of us. Stop giving explodey shit to the people committing genocide, and also stop giving them any diplomatic cover whatsoever.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Local leader who is a Zionist is all out of ideas.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

You can demonize the current president over one issue that is overseas, or you can not vote or vote for the other guy who will not accomplish anything but Israel support and worse.

Weigh what has been accomplished vs your issue vs the alternatives and vote accordingly.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

You could vote for the guy who thinks WiFi gives you leaky brain and vaccines open portals to hell instead. That'd show everyone!

The most fascinating thing about blue MAGATs is how they keep peddling this narrative that leftists will vote for Trump.

None of the leftist discourse online I have ever seen has embraced this idea. Admittedly I never see lemmygrad posts due to instance.

So in your worst case, a fringe group of like 3000 hardcore Putin supporters will maybe vote Trump for fun. The West has fallen.

Maybe when your only talking point is “it’s just a little genocide”, it’s time to reflect.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I was actually joking about people throwing their vote away on RFK. Because with FPTP our choices are assisting with genocide or committing genocide and the murder of political rivals.

I'm not defending anyone. I think what's happening is fucking reprehensible. The alternative happens to be way fucking worse. And until we can get ranked choice, STAR, or some other voting method that better reflects the will of the people that's how it's going to be. All the name calling and progressive purity tests in the world won't change that.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Our voting method is just one of the many myriad problems with how we elect government officials. Even if that was fixed we'd still be ruled by low-population states, and the president can be elected with 20% of the vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whyrat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Not only that, he said recently that these protests wouldn't be happening if he was in the White House. His positions on Palestine and left-leaning protests have not exactly been subtle.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

So that’s American tax dollars that could go to funding things that actually impact Americans directly.

Maintaining peace in the Middle East is important- and the one of the most egregious arguments before all this happened is to provide leverage to keep Israel…. From doing … this.

The reality is that argument is a lie. The war in gaza has set back the goal of peace in the Middle East by decades. Maybe even centuries, while bringing us inexorably closer to WW3.

If Biden reverse course now… he has a chance. If he stays the angry old Zionist, though… he’s going to lose in November.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

There are easy solutions, just depends on what you're trying to solve for. If the student protests are the problem, do nothing and wait like 2 weeks until exams and the end of the semester and they will peter out on their own.

If he has to solve Israel/Palestine peace...yeah that's famously a sticky wicket and there was never going to be an easy solution.

[-] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

At this point the bigger issue is that the US seems to support what appears to be an ongoing genocide.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

campus protests rule

[-] peg@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

There's only one moral solution. Support the protesters and stop enabling genocide.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
102 points (85.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1480 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS