67
submitted 6 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 57 points 6 months ago

The us spent so much time ~~fighting~~ losing to insurgents that it forgot what it means to actually ~~fight~~ lose a war

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 6 months ago
[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 6 months ago

Which war did the US fight that wasn't insurgent except WW2?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 6 months ago

I mean US barely participated in WW2, and then went on pretending they won it.

[-] dinklesplein@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago

saying the US 'barely participated' in WW2 is pretty egregious, just because the USSR did the majority of heavy lifting and very much could have won by itself doesn't mean that's what happened.

the majority of post-normandy heer formations deployed in the western front were the best equipped ones, the western front was denser than the eastern front and lend lease was large enough in scale to certainly have made a material difference. that doesn't mean that the US won the war by itself, or that the american sacrifice was anything comparable, but this sort of revisionism comes off as pretty crankish tbh.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 6 months ago

I recommend reading this book produced by US military, it makes it pretty clear that allies played a minor role in the war overall

a few quotes from it

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Communist ideology, which tends to equate human achievement with industrial production and emphasizes the effect of production on history, prompted the Soviets to seek victory in the factory. In this endeavor, they enjoyed astonishing success under very difficult circumstances."

An US military wrote this !? i am mind-blown that this was published 😳 😳 😳

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 months ago

US military tends to be a lot more sober about these things, or at least they used to be.

[-] T34_69@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

Fascinating and I've got some people who should probably see this, thank you!

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago

amerikkka qin-shi-huangdi-fireball but the Gulf War wasn't ”insurgent”.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

[thinks] I guess the first phase of the Iraq War (but the CIA bribed most of Iraq's officer corps not to fight)

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 6 months ago

I feel like the US just rolled the Iraqi armed forces and it became an insurgency in minutes. Maybe that's just time compression in my memory though

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It would have been much worse if the Iraqi Army had stood and fought. Lots of stories came out from guys at the front who would roll up in Humvees on heavily armoured outposts that were straight up abandoned, where they say there would have been a massacre of us troops if the have stayed. It was such a ubiquitous experience that even 'Generation Kill' has it happen to the protagonists. There was really only one large engagement, and the U.S. Marines absolutely wiped a bunch of Iraqi tanks that were out in the desert, many of whom didn't even get a shot off. All other stuff ended up being insurgency, much of which at the beginning were local militia forces.

What Generation Kill doesn't get into is the theory that the Iraqi commanders and some of the actual troops had been paid off, and also given promises of leniency, which immediately fell through when all former members of the Baathist party were banned from holding government jobs, which put pretty much all the best and brightest of Iraq (including the entire officer corp, most of whom had survived the war) into the position of having to resort to gangsterism (in this form jihadi militia work) to survive in post-war Iraq. While it does make sense that the army wouldn't really want to fight naturally, the rapidity and professionalism of general insurgency only really took off after the Baathists were put completely out of power and points to a broken agreement imo.

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago

Damn for reals? That’s legitimately hilarious.

[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago

i think they mention in Blowback season 1 that pretty much all of the army were either bought off or deserted on their own, taking their guns with them mind you. only in Baghdad there was some serious resistance by the elite Republican Guard.

[-] CommCat@hexbear.net 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

admitting that they have been bullying weaker nations, yeah ok

[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago

uh it's fighting terrorism, sweaty 💅

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 31 points 6 months ago

the POLICE are to UVALDE as the MILITARY is to AMERICA'S NEXT PEER CONFLICT

this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

news

23555 readers
684 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS