188
submitted 6 months ago by Star@sopuli.xyz to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] catalog3115@lemmy.world 70 points 6 months ago

I still stand with Signal App.

  • Telegram has no default E2EE.
  • Threema's encryption was compromised .
  • Threema & Telegram both are for profit companies.
  • Signal is non-profit & all their source code + finances are public. Even their server codes are publically available
[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Even their server codes are publicly available

Last I checked, their provided server code lags behind their production server, so you rarely get to see the current version. However, that's kinda the point of E2EE, is you don't have to trust the server.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

I gladly donate it month to Signal. Love my freedom of speech

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 48 points 6 months ago

I can't believe people are saying Telegram and Threema might be better than Signal. Signal isn't perfect but Telegram and Threema are worse.

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because we keep saying Signal, Telegram, Threema instead of Anti-Libre Software, Service as a Software Substitute and Centralised.

[-] boerbiet@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago

It really depends on your use case. Most of my simple chat messages are the same as I would have in any public space. I have no need for encryption, I have need for convenience in that regard. With Telegram I have my chat history on all devices and don't need to use my phone to connect which are two must-haves for me. For my use case, Signal is the worse option. That doesn't make Signal bad, just not suitable for me.

As a privacy-concious person I am very much aware of the non-secure nature of my chats, but since that is not a factor of consideration to me when it comes to casual chats with a few friends and family members. The worst thing Telegram could do is analyse my chats and ... then what?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] dukethorion@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago

Man, everyone is hopping on the Trash Signal Bandwagon, even though TG is less secure, and nobody (the 99%) uses Threema.

[-] catalog3115@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Don't forget Threem encryption was broken. Threema is not free

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's called disinformation and psychological warfare. How else attack E2EE, libre software?

[-] fl42v@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

I'm wondering if something interesting will fall off the truck this time :D

Context: before that blogpost, cellebrite claimed they can "hack" signal (or they were kinda closer to the truth, and that was media talking abt hacks without reading stuff)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
  • Discord/WhatsApp
    • Anti-Libre Software (fails to include AGPL license file: bans us from removing malicious source code) ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ
  • Telegram/Threema
    • Libre Software โœ…
    • Service as a Software Substitute (app needs service and we are missing server software for it: broken app) ๐Ÿšฉ๐Ÿšฉ
  • Signal
    • Libre Software โœ…
    • Self-Hosting (still needs service from us) โ˜‘๏ธ
    • Centralised ๐Ÿšฉ

~~Needs phone number~~ Centralised
~~Suspicious funding~~ Which lines of its libre software source code are malicious?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] quantenzitrone@feddit.de 17 points 6 months ago

Signal is currently the best middleground between security, simplicity and widespread adoption.

[-] marcie@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

how has no one discussed matrix here

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 33 points 6 months ago

Unable to decrypt message

Unable to decrypt message

Unable to decrypt message

Unable to decrypt message

Unable to decrypt message

Unable to decrypt message

...

[-] Tenkard@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That must mean it's working! :D

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago

I don't get it at all. There are plenty of platforms like matrix, xmpp, simplex that don't require phone numbers tied to your identity. Signal has somehow managed to convince people that it's a private platform, despite it being a US hosted service that requires phone numbers.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 8 points 6 months ago

It's a Google hosted service, which is arguably worse because they may as well be a nation-state unto themselves.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 6 points 6 months ago

Wasn't Amazon involved here as well? It is another "nation-state".

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago

I do not think so, no. However, Amazon is certainly big enough to be un-humorously compared to nation-states as well.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago

I remembered it as being AWS. Checked their blog, and the article about their spending mentions renting space in AWS and Azure too, indeed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Who have they convinced that it is private? I think it has more to do with the overall purpose of the platform. Signal is not made for large group chatting with strangers like Matrix.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

both suck when it comes to real hardcore privacy! Signal is surely a bit more private/secure/whatever, unless maybe you count in the US jurisdiction.

if you want hardcore privacy and security, use SimpleX. it's cutting edge.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Also Tox, Briar, Session etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sunny@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 months ago

Nicely written article and a good read! However I had not heard of Threema before. It looks like a promising messaging app itself, anyone use it?

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 6 months ago

It's relatively popular in DACH countries.

I use it sometimes. It has its fair share of issues, and the back end is not open-source, but it is OK for the most part. Main benefit is that you don't need a mobile number to sign up.

But if you are looking for an alternative IM to use with friends and family, I would rather suggest XMPP, specifically Snikket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 5 points 6 months ago

I am using it to communicate with 3 people (our common ground as I don't have an iPhone and don't use Whatsapp).

A few years ago it felt a bit ruff and awkward to use, but many updates later it is as fluent as any chat app.

The security feels ok. Of course it would be a lot better, if they would open source their code.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I use Signal as my main daily messenger the two major problems in my opinion are:

  1. Centralized server (AWS)
  2. Requires a phone number to register
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ
this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
188 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

32024 readers
1341 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS