246
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A U.S. judge has rejected Burger King's bid to dismiss a lawsuit claiming that it cheated hungry customers by making its Whopper sandwich appear larger than it actually is.

U.S. District Judge Roy Altman in Miami said Burger King must defend against a claim that its depiction of Whoppers on in-store menu boards mislead reasonable customers, amounting to a breach of contract.

Customers in the proposed class action accused Burger King of portraying burgers with ingredients that "overflow over the bun," making it appear the burgers are 35% larger and contain more than double the meat than the chain serves.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago

I'm not overly surprised. I read the article and know the TV ad claims were dismissed, but the currently running TV ad campaign for BK makes their burgers look ridiculously huge - like larger than the entire box a Big Mac comes in.

Check out the whopper shown at the very start of this ad (screenshot) to see what I mean. When did you last have a burger that was half the width of your torso?

[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

This is what I call badvertising.

[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

Lol wtf that is hilarious. It's like almost the size of a soccer/basketball.

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

To be fair, 75 percent of the height between the bun is not burger, but lettuce, tomato, etc. But I've never seen veggies stand that tall or not be compressed by the person making it.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago

Yeah… but that burger is almost twice as large as what they actually sell.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

... nor be that plentiful to begin with.

[-] catreadingabook@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Umm the actual court order the article refers to is super generous to the plaintiffs lol. Whoever's representing them made such basic mistakes that I'm not even sure how they passed the bar exam:

The Plaintiffs' first cause of action lists--in a single paragraph that spans four pages--fifty
different state (and DC) consumer-protection statutes.

(This is a no-no in every federal court in every state.)

In either event, the Plaintiffs concede that they've failed to meet the requirements of Mississippi and Ohio law--even as they ask us not to dismiss those claims.

(Wtf? lol)

we agree with Burger King that a reasonable person wouldn't have interpreted Burger King's TV and online ads as binding offers.

(This is well-settled law and taught to most first-year law students.)

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

BK's menu is absolute shite.

Just get the tiny double cheeseburgers off the saver menu. Two if you want to feel like you've eaten something. It's a fraction of the price and they're not much smaller than a Whopper Double Angus XXL Megaburger or whatever they've named stuff this week.

The only other thing worth your time is the Bacon Double Cheese XL, and only if it's on special offer on the app.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 16 points 2 years ago

They've done it. They've finally gotten fed up with whoppers being mostly bread.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I feel like this belongs in !nottheonion.

Yes. BK is probably sizing the bun-to-patty ratio to make them look and seem larger. They also probably make sure to paint their lettuce green so it looks fresher. Or would, if that weren't already banned by the FDA.

[-] momocchi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

The issue here is it isn’t just ratios. The entire burger itself looks far larger in diameter than it is in reality

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I remember seeing a show when I was a kid made for kids about deceptive advertising (it was on HBO back when HBO was decent) and they had a segment on all the ways they dress food for food ads. It was fascinating. I remember milk was made from Elmer's Glue, cereal flakes were chosen from hundreds of boxes to find the perfect ones, and ice cream, which would melt under the hot lights if it were real, was made from vegetable shortening.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

oh yeah. Commercial food photography is.... a sneaky art. they find textures that are similar and paint them to be what they need. hard gloss like beef juices are lacquer, fruits are made to look fresher with hairspray... and this assumes they're using fruit at all.

[-] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They use motor oil for pancake syrup because it won't soak into the pancakes.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but a small whopper means you eat less Burger King food. That sounds like a plus to me.

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

You can easily have none at all for free.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Oh you and your logic.

[-] sachamato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I want that Bis Ass whopper from the 90s back. It shrinked over time...

[-] 99nights@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I feel like McDonald's Australia needs this. Everything including the fries is smaller then everywhere else.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

They should just claim they meant to advertise "big Whoppers" as in "big lies." Now they were telling the truth. Case over.

[-] pwalshj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Really wish they sell Whataburger everywhere in the States(especially after that Chicago venture capital bought the chain) , never had the problem of the burger being too small there.

Burger King (Hungry Jack's too) should also be ashamed for the sorry excuse of the imitation mayonnaise they use in the Whopper.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
246 points (99.2% liked)

News

37724 readers
444 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS