110

Meet the Anti-Feminist Women's Group Leveraging Their 'Independence' to Convince Americans to Vote Republican (msmagazine.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

"I got mine, fuck you." With a little dash of "Nothing like the afternoon delight of some bootlicking."

I know plenty of staunchly feminist women whose entire personae (or life goal) is the 50s US housewife fantasy. But, that's still a matter of self-determination. Nothing about the GOP's actions indicate self-determination is part of their platform, except for oligarchs. This is yet another play in their ongoing Big Lie Tactic: tell a big enough lie enough times, and people will start to believe it.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Just like Amy Coney Barrett closing doors behind her.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 19 points 6 months ago

They should get their assess back in the kitchen, and let their husbands do the voting. Uppity women.

/s, just in case

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Have we already forgotten about Phyllis Schlafly? It's easy to convince low-information voters to vote against their best interests, so of course the GOP is going to continue that playbook.

[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

I’d rather not meet them, thank you. They seem like toxic garbage people.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"If you give women rights we start doing dumb shit like this", said one spokesperson

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Well I'll be damned look skeletor came back to tell women they should accept fewer rights again.

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024

110 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19096 readers

1825 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News