4

If anything, cannabis seems like a much better (and more profitable) drug around which to build a leisurely establishment.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RagingHungryPanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

that's just a "coffee" shop in Netherlands

[-] Pat12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The difference is you can't taste other people's alcohol but you can smell others' smoke

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People who are going to a place to smoke typically wouldn’t mind that. Take cigar or vape lounges, for instance. Also it’s usually people who don’t smoke weed who act like the smell of weed bothers them.

[-] Pat12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

right but my point is if a group of friends want to go to a bar and some people don't smoke or like the smell of smoke then there is a problem, it's not like they can just opt not to smell smoke

[-] JickleMithers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

...that's why you would only go to a place like that if everyone is down. Having them for people that want to go is fine, no one is forced to go.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That sounds nice in theory, but in reality the result is usually that if the majority of a group smokes, the nonsmokers don't have much of a choice except for looking for new friends. That was a very common complaint when smoking in pubs and restaurants was still legal here.

[-] JickleMithers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Just because one person doesn't want to go to something doesn't mean they shouldn't exist. You're basically saying one person's opinion/choice outweighs an entire group. If those choices constantly put you at odds with the group it might be best to find a group that aligns with your values more. There's also nothing wrong with being friends with the people that want to go to things you don't like, just tag along when they do things you do like. You also don't have to have one set of friends, you can have multiple groups that like to do different things. I'm not pro banning things for the sake of others that can choose not to participate.

[-] Noggindrill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

there are THC drinks where I live, always a nice option for me to have at gatherings as a non-alcohol person.

[-] pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Right but you can consume cannabis in tons of different ways - cookies, cocktails, etc. Restaurants had smoking areas for decades with far worse air filtration systems.

[-] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Dry vaporizers (with temperature below 200C, convection-based) don't have smoke so are a lot less offensive with smell, if not odorless particularly with access to fresh air.

Also people smelling of alcohol, particularly if they are drunk or drinking liquor, is definitely a thing. Also barfing. I wouldn't doubt bars having bad smells sometimes.

[-] dystop@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Edibles might make it better. But then you'll need to give people something to do for an hour or so before it kicks in...

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You mean like eating, playing board games, and socializing?

[-] lwuy9v5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There are some board game cafes in the states. And some of those overlap with legal weed :) but smoking indoors in public is still a no-go

[-] Kalamazooligan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

As long as you don't stink. So fucking sick of weed users smelling like ass in public.

[-] Solo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'm sick of alcohol users smelling like ass. If you don't drink then the smell of alcohol on someone's breath is absolutely nauseating.

[-] justhach@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Its hard to justify it for the same reasons we can't have Shisha bars and smoking lounges (at least where I live): 2nd hand smoke.

I can, as a non drinker, go to a bar and have myself a soda, and leave there as sober as when I walked in. If I do that in a room where everyone is smoking up, I will get high from the second hand smoke whether I want to for not.

I mean, why not just have a general social club with coffee/food, games, etc, and just step outside for a puff?

[-] tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Cannabis can be edible and here in Milwaukee we're already seeing farm bill delta9 show up in bars and restaurants.

[-] DanglingFury@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The smoke issue has been solved. I've been to cigar lounges that do not smell outside and barely smell inside, despite over a dozen people smoking sotgies in there. Massive HVAC systems and filters handle it all.

[-] Gerula@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

No it wouldn't. I'm sick and tired of the childish argument that if we accept alcohol then we have to accept or introduce other substance abuses because some find it more appealing.

[-] Solo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Why shouldn't we accept it? Its already poven to be better for you than alcohol, many people enjoy it, and a lot less deaths per year will be caused by wee than alcohol. Should people who don't want to drink not be allowed to have a place they can hang out similar to a bar?

[-] Gerula@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Here we go again. People who don't want to drink alcohol can hang anywhere and still don't drink acohol. The unwillingness to drink alcohol or that "many people like it" are not actual arguments to introduce and use other health damaging substances rerdless of their nature and effects.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I just want constancy. Weed is less dangerous than alcohol. Ban both, legalize both, legalize weed but not alcohol, or keep things the way they are and drop the premise that it has anything to do with health and safety.

[-] Gerula@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That "less dangerous" is so subjective and unfounded that I'm not going to address.

On the other hand do you think it's a good idea to think in extremes? Alcohol is rooted in our culture since literally thousands of years to get it out is almost impossible now but we can struggle for moderation. Weed as we find it on the market didn't even exist 100 years ago. So maybe it's a good idea to introduce it get it common as alcohol so in 50 years we will have the problems with alcohol and with weed on top. Smart.

Then we can go further to other drugs because we cant leave them outside. We have to be consistent and some people really like it.

[-] zepheriths@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The issue is that a lot of people that smoke weed in place would reak. I don't think many people would enjoy the smell

[-] zarp86@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Consumables only. Problem solved.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
4 points (70.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29816 readers
146 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS