89
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kethal@lemmy.world 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's unfair to blame the restaurant when the private equity firm that bought them deliberately stripped the restaurant's assets, hoping to rip off some later buyer. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/private-equity-rolled-red-lobster-rcna153397

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That’s… kinda the point of this article? It literally says the decline started when private equity acquired them

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, but the article makes it seem like their failure was based on mistakes. This was exactly what they intended.

A private equity firm bought them to naked short the stock, while running the business into the ground, so they never have to replace the holdings they never borrowed in the first place. It’s the same as what investors tried to do with GameStop before r/wallstreetbets caught on and held them out of bankruptcy. It’s called predatory naked shorting.

[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

A private equity firm bought them to naked short the stock

You just like throwing around words regardless of meaning?

They owned equity, so they were long, not short. They owned a stake so they weren't naked.

What they did was a simple extraction of value from something they owned, destroying it. It has nothing to do with short selling, and has nothing to do with manipulation of stock trading (after all, they took it private so that it wouldn't be publicly traded, so there were no public traders to manipulate).

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Shhhhhhhhhh, we read headlines. Not articles. And we need the headline to be presented on tiktok, with overlaying captions which are only one one at a time, but big enough to cover the whole screen. Also, throw in half a dozen unrelated things, like birds dancing, and some guy skate boarding. All for no reason. This is how things are now.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah. Get your shit together Jeff.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

I quit going after my lobster was rubber and the size of a large shrimp.

[-] Ohi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Personally I think the mistake was letting mice run around the front of the house during my last visit. We pointed it out to the staff who gave us the most fake surprised look I've ever seen.

It's too bad, their Cajun Chicken pasta is FIRE.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Are you sure they were mice and not rats? Because I hear that rats can become gourmet chefs with an odd sort of puppetry technique.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Whenever I see rats in a restaurant, I always assume there’s a Ratatouille situation going on in the kitchen. Quality does vary.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

How often do you see rats in a restaurant?

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

They went one further and hired the rats directly to front of the house.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Ratatouille II: Mousetre D'

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

I guarantee you, the secret ingredients are butter, garlic, salt, sugar, and cayenne. You can make it at home.

this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
89 points (96.8% liked)

News

36546 readers
473 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS