109
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

At least we can quit complaining when he votes against his own party now.

[-] CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 5 months ago

I think that's why he switched. If he runs again, he loses the D next to his name on the ballot, thereby convincing his constituents he's not a Democrat in the vilified label that the Conservatives throw around, especially in a state as red as West Virginia.

It may actually get him to be re elected, allowing him to caucus with the Democrats without being seen as one.

[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I only see it as a big fuck you to the eventual democratic candidate. He splits the "progressive" side of the vote and gets the Republican elected.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ughh, this is West Virginia. A democrat being elected is a miracle in a Trump +39 state.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Okay and if that 'Democrat' opposes the whole party agenda and literally prevents movement toward the Democrats party goals, then it doesn't really matter if he says hes a democrat or not? May as well run someone who will work with your party because Manchin was functionally a Republican.

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

He approved Biden's judges nominations. It's important.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

The people who wanted the seat he said he was going to leave.

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Good riddance. Goodbye shitbag

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 5 months ago

annnnd nothing of value was lost...

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

No doubt he will still caucus with Democrats to protect his assigned parking space, otherwise Fetterman will get it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

"Employee of the month"

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

This one has always been a trolling asshole.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 6 points 5 months ago

Interesting, because while he has always been a thorn in the democratic caucus’ side, running as an independent could keep the seat from the favored republican and he could still caucus with the democrats. There is some nuance here… although I would love if it all came down to Jim Justice insulting him at a party or something.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who has spent his entire decadeslong political career as a Democrat, said Friday he is leaving the party and registering as an independent, raising speculation about whether he may run for another Senate term or for governor this fall.

Manchin's move was first reported by longtime West Virginia radio host Hoppy Kercheval.

Manchin, 76, served as West Virginia governor from 2005 to 2010, when he won a special election to fill a Senate seat left vacant by the death of legendary Democrat Robert Byrd.

Jim Justice, backed by Trump, won the Republican nomination for Senate and had been favored to succeed Manchin in the fall.

But Manchin’s surprise move could scramble that race if he decides to run for re-election as an independent.

If he is considering an independent bid for either office, Manchin had until June 1 to change his party affiliation; West Virginia state law allows the secretary of state to refuse to certify a candidate if they were registered to vote with a different party within 60 days of filing to run for office.


The original article contains 365 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

So does he give up his seat?

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 0 points 5 months ago

He isn't even going to be a good independent. Guy doesn't know what in the middle even is. Just a soft conservative in denial.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
109 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1655 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS