165
submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Far-right conservatives are sowing misinformation that inaccurately characterizes IUDs, emergency contraception, even birth-control pills as causing abortions

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why would they let the truth stop them when they stole the Supreme Court and can just do what they want with near-impunity now?

The rulings this month are going to be bad, folks. And if you aren’t worried about the national level issues, take a look at what’s going on the gulf south. It’s wild west/medieval shit down here.

Louisiana just ~~brought back chemical~~ allows for surgical castration as a sentence for pedophiles. And what group do they call groomers more than any other? I’ll give you a hint: there’s a reason they continue to attack drag queens and the trans community.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh weird, the article I saw must’ve missed that (double checked and it says chemical). Hooray it’s even worse than I thought…

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Hell, they are calling straight librarians, teachers, professors, etc..."groomers" as well.

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

You're thinking about it all wrong. They're just trying to create the right set of conditions to produce the next Turing and kickstart the development of true AGI.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Could threaten access" what a shit headline. They are already actively denying access in their controlled areas. This isn't a problem that's forming, this is a problem that is already here and already large.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 5 months ago

Not even two years since Dobbs. "Oh, no, no - there's no threat to contraception" they said.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Republican lawmakers in Missouri blocked a bill to widen access to birth-control pills by falsely claiming they induce abortions. An antiabortion group in Louisiana killed legislation to enshrine a right to birth control by inaccurately equating emergency contraception with abortion drugs. An Idaho think tank focused on “biblical activism” is pushing state legislators to ban access to emergency contraception and intrauterine devices (IUDs) by mislabeling them as “abortifacients.”

[-] suzune@ani.social 5 points 5 months ago

Why isn't the abortion ban restricted to Christians only?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Indeed. The idea that a group doing "biblical activism" has any impact on others in a secular nation is horrifying. Not everyone is in their little book club, and not even all the people in their book club interpret it the same way.

If you are someone in their little group, don't get an abortion. Or contraception. And leave everyone else alone.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Conservative attacks on birth control could threaten access

Do they mean... apart from all the access they've already threatened?

Sounds like they got somebody from the "Treat-Israel-With-Kid-Gloves" department to write that headline.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

We have to be "objective" and, uh, "both sides", you know.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Remember how the far right trolls, along with not a few Enlightened Centrists (TM), were telling everyone to just CALM DOWN in the wake of the 2022 decision by Trollito and friends on the corrupted court?

[-] MockingMoniker@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That's the point.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
165 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS