79

Interpret 'hardest' however suits you. Look forward to your answers!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Alice@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You can't argue with crazy. In fact, if you're that desperate for crazy to validate reality for you, you have deeper problems.

Oh also if you help a family member who's threatening to kill themselves, they're just gonna threaten that every time they need $5.

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Understand that people will come and go in your life. For better or for worse.

Just because you've known somebody most of your life don't assume you know anything about them. They can surprise you, for better or for worse. And for my experience it's generally for the worse.

People change and sometimes it's best to just let go.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

As the government gradually erodes away our rights, at least we still have the right to wipe our asses with pinecones.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FookReddit69@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

If you had a chance to get laid as a teen DO IT. Or you'll regret it, especially if you never get the chance as an adult.

[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

I'm willing to bet that there are millions of teen parents who would have a different view of this. The problem is that teens often don't have access to birth control, or are manipulated, or plain stupid because their brains haven't finished developing yet.

I'm sure that some people would have regrets about not getting laid as teens. But it's hardly a hard and fast rule.

[-] weeeeum@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

No offense to the guy, but looking at his post history, I don't think if this is thoroughly tested advice....

[-] FookReddit69@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago

I'm the living proof

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] eightpix@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Alcohol is a poison.

[-] thefrankring@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

We're all going to die.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 5 months ago

Weapons are a human right, completely independent of anything about rebellions or keeping the government in check.

Individually, if you prevent a person from carrying a weapon when they’re in a dangerous situation, it’s like locking them into a cage with a hungry tiger in it.

It’s perfectly natural for a person to be able to reach out and pick up a weapon. To block someone from this takes active effort.

And if that person is in a dangerous situation, and you make that effort to prevent them from being armed, you’re actively violating their rights.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
79 points (96.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43905 readers
1780 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS