196
submitted 5 months ago by kescusay@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 116 points 5 months ago

Sharing this here because the difference in responses to this guilty verdict couldn't be more stark. During his time in office, Trump pardoned close associates of various crimes. Out of a sense of integrity, Biden has said he won't pardon his son.

The charges are absurd, but he was found guilty by a jury of his peers, and Biden won't put his thumb on the scales.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 81 points 5 months ago

Trump put his children in the white house, making them politically relevant. If Trump had said anything about pardoning his children, thst would have been political news.

Hunter has nothing to do with politics other than Republicans trying to equate having children with nepotism. This is not politics.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Conservatives love making children political though.

  • Having sex but don't want children? You're a godless slut.

  • Pregnant and don't want children? You're not capable of making decisions about your body.

  • Had an abortion? You're an evil baby killing slut.

  • Have children you don't want? You're a slut who shouldn't have sex if you couldn't feed your kids.

  • Child of a Democratic president going through awkward teenage years? You're a horse face, Chelsea Clinton.

  • Try to reach American soil to claim asylum? We're gonna keep your kids in cages, argue in front of a judge that we're not obligated to give them any hygienic items like soap or toothpaste, and deport you. Hope your home country isn't as dangerous as you thought it was!

  • You're a loving couple in a committed relationship who want to adopt one of the many "unwanted" children in our foster system? Get fucked queers; our god says only the straights get to enjoy being parents.

  • Your child needs medical care? Why should my tax dollars pay for that?

  • Your local public school sucks? Well maybe you should have been able to afford private tuition to a school that definitely doesn't exist because public schools were forced to integrate. Oh, and we're gonna siphon more money out of your kids' school to pay for ours- that tuition ain't cheap, you know.

And, for international flavor:

  • You don't want your kids to be genocided by Israel? Then maybe they shouldn't have been one of the more than 50% of Gaza's population who either weren't born or weren't old enough to vote 16 years ago when Hamas held their last election.
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 8 points 5 months ago

Yes, conservatives love pretending that non-political things are political. Per your examples having children is political, which would make the term political meaningless if we let them define political.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago

We need to stop politicising politics, clearly.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Trump, under a clear and disgusting display of nepotism, put his completely unqualified family members into positions of power.

Fixed that for you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I completely agree. Just like I agreed with Fetterman for defending Boebert’s kids from public judgement. These people aren’t politicians. They don’t deserve the press scrutiny of a politician.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

The charges are absurd

Why? Lying on the gun purchase background check form is a felony. It says so right above the signature line on the form. The evidence he lied on the form looks pretty strong.

I do realize the crime is not prosecuted often, but that seems like a mistake. The Charleston church shooter, for example should have failed his background check and been prosecuted for the same crime.

[-] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 19 points 5 months ago

Theres no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt he was on substances when he purchased the firearm. The form asks if you're a USER of drugs. If he was not using substances when he was buying the firearm, he didn't lie.

That's fine. If this is now precedent, the government needs to go and retroactively charge all users, and not just a spotlight democrat.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

27 CFR § 478.11 addresses that. The court is not making new law here.

Such use is not limited to the use of drugs on a particular day, or within a matter of days or weeks before, but rather that the unlawful use has occurred recently enough to indicate that the individual is actively engaged in such conduct. A person may be an unlawful current user of a controlled substance even though the substance is not being used at the precise time the person seeks to acquire a firearm or receives or possesses a firearm.

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago

Right, the charges aren’t absurd at all. No one is above the law; not Hunter, not Trump. It applies to everyone. The evidence was provided to a jury of his peers, and they determined that that evidence proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Good, it's less the right can point to and say biden is a hypocrite on.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 33 points 5 months ago

Who cares if they do? They literally lie to slander the "radical left" as they call it. They're shameless and half the eligible voters are too.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That saying of you don't stoop to your enemies tactics means a lot here. Just because they do illegal shit, doesn't mean everyone else should just say fuck it. Someone has to uphold the law. If the law is unjust then change the law

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wiz@midwest.social 105 points 5 months ago

So, we're now prosecuting all gun owners who have done drugs in the past?

Shout-out to all you 2nd Amendment bros.

[-] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

Oh no, not all gun owners who’ve done drugs. Just certain ones.

The 2nd amendment bros aren’t going to help in this case. The NRA declined get involved in the police shooting of Philando Castile who was licensed to carry his gun and who told the police he was legally carrying it. The NRA said it was because he also was in possession of Marijuana, which makes it illegal for him to have a gun.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Do not lump the NRA in with gun owners. FUDDs are basically the only people who donate to the nra anymore. They're a trash ass organization that just shills for repubs. Every gun owner who isn't suckin the nras tit, thinks that the Castile case was bullshit, same with the Taylor shooting. Those cops should be in jail for murder.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They still mostly all vote for Republicans. The NRA doesn't need to radicalize them if they are already going to vote for the NRA's candidate (Republican).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So, we’re now prosecuting all gun owners who have done drugs in the past?

Florida would become a prison colony

[-] manmachine@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Escape From ~~New York~~ Jacksonville

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Floiria is a prison colony

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yet another reason why decriminalizing isn't enough, weed (and others) need to be reclassified.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

NRA has been conspicuously silent throughout all of this...

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 63 points 5 months ago

I can clearly imagine the response from the Trumpers:

"Biden WANTED to convict his son so he could make it SEEM like the justice system is fair, when really its all RIGGED!!!"

The conspiracy mind is hard to crack, and while I like seeing a fair an impartial system at work I don't think it will actually sway many people who think it's corrupt.

[-] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

Hunter Biden’s conviction is the best possible evidence that the president is not “rigging” the criminal justice system. Will that stop Trump and his apologists from claiming otherwise? Of course not

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

“What are you a blind sheep? This is CLEARLY a RIGGED FALSE FLAG conviction that the CROOKED Democrats did to make everyone think that the justice system is fair but we’re TOO SMART for that and us REAL AMERICANS can see what they’re trying to do

Anyway donate money to my campaign”

and then trump shits himself and takes a nap or something, idk

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 5 months ago

What a poser. The other guy racked up more than 11 times as many conviction. Hunter is an amateur.

/s

[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Good thing the justice system is a scam and a hoax. Can't wait to hear how rigged this trial was tonight and for the next 3 weeks on fair and balanced FOX news. They should run together. Biden Jr/Trump 2024 - double the felons, double the fun.

[-] AreaKode@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

That IT! I'm no longer voting Hunter Biden for president. Not that I was going to... But NOW I definitely won't!

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

“No one in this country is above the law,” special counsel David Weiss, the prosecutor who has led the long-running federal investigation into the president’s son, told reporters after the verdict.

Somebody remind this to Trump supporters.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Do the crime, do the time. You'll never see a conservative admit to this when it applies to Cheeto Jesus

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 months ago

I'm happy this stupid trial might be on its way out from the news headlines. It was utterly unimportant, but the media was trying to hype it as the mirror to Trump's trial. Literally the only legitimate news story was Biden saying he wouldn't pardon his son. That's it. Everything else is just news organizations failing to resist rightwing manipulation and/or their deeply held belief in finding a "both sides" for every issue.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Trump and every conservative mouth piece is going to bring this up constantly until the election. Example 1

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 14 points 5 months ago

Present Hunter Biden convicted of 3 felonies. Gonna look bad for Future Hunter Biden.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 16 points 5 months ago

I'm not voting for Hunter Biden. He's a convicted felon!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 5 months ago

Hunter is not involved in politics.

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Good, because I won't vote for a felon.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

Depends on the felony for me, since there are some people who have felonies but have reformed and some people who have ridiculous felonies from the war on drugs designed to ruin the lives of minorities. Most states make posessing any quantity of herion a felony. Someone who has been clean for decades could still get my vote if they aligned with my views because past drug use they learned from is not a dealbreaker for me.

Now violence based felonies or felonies related to running or being in office would be a hard no among some other ones.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

A felony related to climate protesting and the like wouldn't bother me either. Not that it should be a felony in the first place, but it's plausible with the way that protesting is being cracked down on in many jurisdictions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

I'd still vote for him

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What's the typical sentence?

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

does this mean all the MAGAts are gonna vote for him now? next VP pick for Trump?

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Oh look, nobody is blaming the DA or claiming that the trial and the judge were rigged. Funny that.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Quick, hire him as the Democratic nominee!

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

So maybe he gets sentenced to 3 months and then comes back to a new life?

Or the Trumpfus way.... revenge! Lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
196 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS