428
these fucking ‘geniuses’ needed to be in a room with this moron to determine he’s a moron?
They knew he was a moron before entering. They were hoping the moron was good enough of a liar to hide the fact that he’s a moron. The moron failed.
Never go full moron.
I feel like him being a convicted felon mainly because he's terrible liar would've been more than enough proof
That case actually proved that he’s good at hiding his lies. Part of the prosecution’s case was testimony based, not connected physical evidence. That’s why the defense was working so hard to discredit Cohen. His credibility was imperative for conviction.
Part of being a good liar is not pissing off the ppl who know the truth
Seems that way. I stick to white lies. No one is taking you to court over saying you don’t look fat in that dress. Lol
They aren't geniuses they are just rich. They usually don't go together
clearly that's what the scare quotes were for
And yet they back him.
If hiring a convicted felon, rapist, failed businessman, dementia patient means they'll end up with a bigger yacht to take them to Epstein's private island, then yes. CEOs will gladly back him.
I have a feeling that they will, just to make an extra buck for themselves.
They think they can manipulate him. Anyone voting for him either thinks that ( or can profit off it), is deeply uneducated, or truly believes that he is the next Messiah.
On the one hand there is the prospect of electing a clown they can control and use to get another tax break and other business friendly policies, like unlimited pollution, and on the other hand there's a chance he will lead his christofascist cult members on a jihad to destroy democracy, and maybe civilization itself, which would put a pretty big dent in their profit margins. What to do, what to do....
They basically get the status quo with Biden. I think this may actually signal a turning point for at least some of them.
The reliable thing they hate vs the wildcat gamble? Okay, excellent viewpoint as usual.
the status quo is fucking amazing for billionaires. why would they want to tamper with that
Trump needs a glass of warm milk and a nap in a jail cell, not to be running for president.
They are all going to donate to him and vote for him, what is this bullshit
They view him as a useful idiot. They think they'll be able to control him, but they should have realized by now that's not possible. He's like a windup toy. You can send him in a direction, but he may drift off course or someone else might redirect him.
IKR 😞
AI generated article. Just white noise to fill the space in between Gaza genocides and climate change collapse.
He’s so old, why do they keep making trump run?
He's easy to manipulate and ideological committed to doing fascism on a national scale.
But it's not like they didn't try to run other people. DeSantis, Cruz, Hailey, Christie - they all ended up eating shit.
Winning is kind of his only chance to avoid the consequences for a lifetime of breaking the rules.
Sometimes kids have backbone?
Also, if we believe the GoP has some magical pee-party leverage over Mr Trump, then he represents a special kind of provably-shameless monkey for them to push around.
Their golden goose may be doddering, decrepit and rambling, but if he's still making eggs then he's valuable as-is.
No other want's the job? Or it's better to stay 2nd row and whisper stupid things to front row?
That doesn't stop his believers. You know, like some former pope who couldn't even really talk anymore?
So he's doing 'the Elon'?
Both - DJT and EM - want's AI. Or an excuse for the shitty output - for both human idiocracy and artificial intelligence. Honey, where's my pitchfork?
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
428 points (97.8% liked)
News
36384 readers
828 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS