102

Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 105 points 4 months ago

Regardless of one's opinion of the current situation, that he is considering it is a good thing. There are probably no good options, but if the pros and cons are weighed and the conclusion is that Biden endorsing someone else is the better choice, then that's what should be done.

Regardless, voting this November is about voting against fascism, regardless of who the Dem candidate is.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

I still want him to go full Dark Brandon and save his race by being a complete and unmitigated lunatic pointed at Trump and the GOP.

BUT...

...if you all want him to drop out, you need to push collectively. He has given in before.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

I'd prefer him to stay in if, realistically speaking, he is capable of doing so.

However, I also recognize that, even if he IS capable of doing so, he has not inspired confidence in the electorate in being capable of doing so. That alone may mandate his replacement even if all it was was a bad night.

I don't think he's in rapid decline - but if he is, or if he isn't but feels he cannot convincingly portray himself as well going forward, stepping down might be the right choice.

[-] TomSelleck@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago

I think what’s really put strain on his mental capacity is the campaign. It’s one thing to be in a demanding position as an elected official, at his age, but then add on all the campaign stops, speeches, and events. It’s too much for most people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

HA! A reasonable take. Thank you! Sometimes it really does feel like I'm trying to convince a wall to not stand in the way.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Samesies. But seriously, my man Joe is asking for four more years of a very physically punishing job. He doesn’t need it like some deranged narcissistic sociopaths we could mention.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago

The dark Brandon stuff is 98% fluff, talk, and meme. Biden has already said that they're going to take the high road on the presidential immunity matter. So, we're going to high road all the way to fascism while waiting for Biden to do the meme.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He should do both. Abuse his new powers to somehow cause a sever detriment to Trump or Fascism or both, then be like 'Oh im not the guy for the next four years.' It would literally be having your cake and eating it two. Biden actual having balls and Biden stepping aside are both moves that will more than likely track super hard with anyone who's not already locked for Trump.

Scorch Trumps earth then drop the mic and the chances they call for a Democratic encore will skyrocket I'd bet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Michigander here to tell you that Whitmer is a fantastic option.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

She is almost exactly 8 years younger than Harris. If Biden flat-out resigns over this, I expect President Harris to nominate Whitmer as her VP. I look forward to that hearing in the House (since they have to approve the appointment too, although they will likely just sit on it.)

Imagine Harris-Whitmer for 8 years, then Whitmer-someoneyounger for 8 more

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Harris is not a viable ticket head.

The sturm und drang of this is gonna be a friggin nightmare if they don’t do this cleanly.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The only way it can possibly go down is to pick Harris. Biden already picked Harris as his understudy. And all those votes for Biden in the primaries were also implicitly for Harris, given Biden's age.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

Harris doesn't inspire confidence for me, but she may still be the better choice. Regardless, if she's the Dem candidate, she has my total support for this election, because I would very much like a choice in every election of my life going forward.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Fat chance, but Harris could be selfless and participate in the pragmatic realpolitik that we need in order to save the country. I am not sure who’s the best candidate, but I imagine that someone not directly tied to the Israel debacle would be good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 79 points 4 months ago

I do not give a fuck who is D on the ticket. I'm still voting D because the alternative is disastrous. If Biden stays, I am voting for him. With the exception of the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, the administration has been very competent. Remember, that old man doesn't do much. The work is done by his team. Now think back on the work and damage the Trump team did. The choice is easy.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

The work is done by his team

And this is really important. He's got some kickass people he's appointed. Id vote for Joe just to keep Lena Khan at the FTC. All those people get replaced by fascists in the event Trump wins again. Unlike last time, every single member of his administration is going to be a loyalist.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

I’ll vote d no matter what. I’d take a dead d over a live r.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Thank you! It drives me nuts that this isn't the key takeaway in every post and article I see. On one hand we an amped up old man who would sell out his family for a dollar, let alone the rest of us who is friends with dictators and thinks they're really sharp people with good ideas, and is also a convicted felon who surrounds himself with other current or future convicted felons, and has been saying for years he wants to imprison or hurt his critics. On the other hand, we have a barely older, regular old man who at least has good intentions, hires competent people, and who makes mistakes but admits to them and learns from it, who happens to be very stereotypically old man. How people are making this an apples to apples comparison is insane.

This behavior with Joe didn't start at the debate. It's the same Joe we've had for years. And this isn't new, even for people younger than Biden is.

Guardian, 2008: Fatigue and racism threaten to knock Obama bandwagon off the road

Barack Obama was showing signs of campaign fatigue. Sitting on a picnic bench in a park on Pagoda Street, Indianapolis, in discussion with a group of 30 supporters, he told a story about the "modest" background of himself and his wife, Michelle. And 10 minutes later, seemingly having forgotten, he told them it all again.

It is hardly surprising, given that he has been on the road almost non-stop since Christmas, battling Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination. In recent weeks, he has often seemed absent-minded, forgetting the names of the towns he is in.

Tiredness is the least of Obama's problems. After a relatively smooth and well-planned march towards the Oval Office, his campaign is facing its greatest crisis. "He is in the middle of a shit storm," one of the journalists travelling with him said.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

With the exception of the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, the administration has been very competent.

Two exceptions: Biden's refusal today to use the power the SCOTUS decision gave him to rein in the court is also incompetent (not to mention, suicidal).

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 months ago

First and foremost: The New York Times has a very well known anti-Biden bias https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/04/25/new-york-times-biden-white-house-00154219

Second: While it is very important to understand that not all sources can go "on the record" this... is purely a rumor from an unattributed source "close to the president".

So can we please stop cheering on russian/ccp/trump propaganda?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If Joe Biden sticks around and manages to win, he'll be remembered as a pretty average president. If he sticks around and loses, he'll be remembered as a politician whose arrogance hurt the whole country.

If he withdraws without more fuss, he'll be remembered as an extraordinarily decent and humble man, especially among politicians, regardless of the results of the election.

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

If He steps side and the next D loses, it would also be biden's fault for throwing away his encumbancy advantage.

Remember, whoever gets chosen to replace Biden, even if it were Ronald Reagan, or mitt Romney, Trump and company will say they are even more liberal than Biden and will take away guns, force all women to get post 9 month abortions etc. And Maga, conservatives will believe it since there's no evidence to the contrary. With Biden, he hasn't fine those things these past 4 years. He's Only "done a bag job"

I feel like Biden is in a difficult situation and voters are partially to blame for electing Biden in 2020 over another younger/healthier candidate (i voted Bernie who is old, but seems healthier than Biden in some ways).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

I'd vote for a bag of Biden's toenail clippings over Trump. Stay in the race or leave, I don't really care, so long as they've got a winning strategy to follow. Trump has done enough damage to this country - let's not give him another round.

I wish only the best to not-Trump, whoever that ends up being.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

If he bows out, I'll breathe a sigh of relief. In a way, it doesn't matter if he had a cold and jet lag during the debate, and he's tip-top now. In fact, I've watched footage of him since the debate, and it seems to be true. He's back to his normal self.

But the political damage could be too much, regardless of his actual health.

At the same time, if he doesn't bow out, I will gladly crawl through broken glass to vote for him.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

It's July. Who the fuck is supposed to replace him? These articles are fuckin pointless.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

There is someone in office right now whose only real job is to step in if the President can no longer do the job. Remember her?

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Kamala Harris has the elect-ability and personality of a potato that you left on the counter for too long and it grows eyes.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I compare her more to broccoli or peas. Nobody's favorite food, but gives you the proper nutrients to fight fascism. Now shut up and eat your peas.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

If it’s Harris we’re toast. Plain and simple. If I’m proved wrong in that, no one would be happier than me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Buttigieg, Newsom, AOC, Kamala, etc, etc, etc. take your pick from any of the prominent Democrats.

[-] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I was just thinking that AOC isn't old enough but she turns 35 in October, good timing.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

AOC/Bernie 2024! “Time to Take Out the Trash!”

[-] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"And in a historical turn of events, every member of the DNC over 50 has elected to just...not vote this November. Calling it a once in a generation political upset, mainline Democrats have almost unanimously elected to...not elect anyone. One such non-voter was on record not outside of a polling station saying 'I can't in good conscience vote for someone who actually seems to stand for something. It's just not what you're supposed to do as a Democrat and it's not in accordance with any beliefs I might have had, if I had ever decided to have any.'"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 4 months ago

Actually pointless. Like, not a figure of speech. It’s too late to legally position a new candidate. It would be challenged. The Heritage foundation is already priming legal challenges, and who was that who owned the courts, again?

Let’s imagine that he does step down. How would everyone agree on where to vote next? What’s the process to get them in the running again? What’s your guess on the timeline to do that unassailably vs serious legal opponents?

I wonder what I would do if I were running a campaign for a felon and I needed to make it happen no matter what. I don’t have a good candidate but I do have propaganda networks and I do own judges everywhere, and my opposition has a hard time agreeing with each other, and they crumple apart like tissue paper on basic purity tests, and their candidate is old and has a stutter- his only seeming drawbacks that play to the media.

I wonder what I could do to improve my position and involve my only remaining power assets.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago

Why would it be too late to position a new candidate?

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Because it takes time to build a national campaign. You need 50 different states to sign off on the ballots. The DNC can basically hand-pick a candidate, but they would basically be telling every primary voter to get fucked.

There would be legal challenges in 50 different states, and the GOP only needs one activist judge (and they have 6 on the SCOTUS).

The last time there was a brokered convention was 1952.

Plus, who? Who is the dream candidate? Who is so widely appealing that they would be unanimously accepted by the Democratic party leadership and the voters? Who has the leadership qualities, the experience, the confidence, the name recognition, and the credentials to beat the shit out of Trump? And where the fuck have they been?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

My concern with him leaving is who would replace him???

My worst nightmare, is the hag from 2016 returns. She'd lose again, guaranteed, and before you say no. The signs are there, she's been getting her face out there and testing the waters. And she still likely has the money/clout to buy another DNC nomination.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 11 points 4 months ago

Many, many shitty scenarios. No clear answer as to what the right choice is and if we lose well always be second guessing what could've been.

Anyone telling you this is an easy choice, or is speaking with absolute confidence is full of shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
102 points (73.4% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3326 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS