493
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 99 points 4 months ago

I think it would be fun to ask him what he disagrees with in the plan, if hes actually trying to distance himself.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 42 points 4 months ago

That would require him to understand the plan. He doesn't care about the plan, he just wants to win and will promise whatever to get it.

This plan is being drafted by those who figure they will be in the room with President Trump after the election.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago

Who KNOW they’ll be in the room. He knows what it is. He’s lying imo.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 4 months ago

Who KNOW they’ll be in the room.

Not going to argue that

He knows what it is.

Maybe in the vaguest sense. He doesn't know the details because he doesn't care and he didn't write the thing. I'm not defending Trump; I just think he doesn't care what he promises as long as he is President.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

"Don't you remember a few weeks ago when you said you wanted to..."

Project 2025 Administrative Slogan.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

The coup is already 2/3 complete.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The orange felon/rapist/serial liar can slither out of anything.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago

This is what absolutely any competent debater would have asked him, in front of a national audience. Sadly, the moment has passed. Still think he's our guy!?

[-] elrik@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Yes, Biden still is our guy.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I genuinely appreciate the honesty. Like many, I will vote for a baggy full of bees to stop Trump, so I guess I will be voting for Biden...

A reminder for others who say this is "not the right time to change candidates/switch horses/whatever": this is exactly the time for the option to at least be explored. Until Ohio has Biden on the ballot, it can be changed, so this is quite literally the only time this can be corrected. I would 1000x more rather be alarmist and wrong than to stick with Biden and suffer Trump and the possible end of our democracy. But those are the stakes...

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 71 points 4 months ago

Why Democrats are not putting project 2025 front and center in their attacks on R's is beyond me.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 35 points 4 months ago

It is very strange and alarming that project 2025 is this huge fucking problem that no one is truly addressing in any formal way.

I mean, the people behind it are essentially wealthy domestic terrorists who keep paying off the Supreme Court with "gratuities." Someone needs to put a stop to this blatant display of corruption and fascism. I don't understand what's taking so long.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 43 points 4 months ago

It's a large complex document and we are a simple, overworked, undereducated and frightened people, on the whole. Start circulating this graphic to help make it a simpler consideration of how the specific dangers will directly impact different populations. Chances are good there's at least one on the list that each person you share with would care about.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Thank you so much for this!

[-] alilbee@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

We can't get upset at politicians for what we are failing to pay attention to. The democrats are working against it.

democrats.org

AP

Axios

Now, if the concern is "why hasn't anything worked to fully dismantle this plan", the answer is that it's a well-crafted (albeit evil) plan made over decades. It's not going to have Death Star exhaust ports for the right Democrat Skywalker to shoot a pulse into. It's going to take a concerted, unified, lengthy effort from politicians and the voters to defeat it. All good things do.

The poster above gave you a great infographic and there are others online. The route forward involves us sharing with others, collaborating on strategic voting, and forming plans to help the vulnerable around us in the event that it comes to pass. It is stressful, but know you're sharing that with a ton of people right now.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 18 points 4 months ago

Cause they're incompetent.

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Because their sponsors want a lot of what's in it

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

What’s shocking is most die hard supporters don’t even know about it

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago

Because it's not meant for them so they don't announce it like that, it's meant for the big donors

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It just highlights that republicans almost universally have no idea what they’re voting for

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

they think they're voting for a) mandatory jeebus; b) guns; c) owning the libs

anything else: dontknowdontcare. by design

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

They only know how to punch left

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It's like playing Whac-A-Mole and they all pop up, then some moles approach you from behind with knives.

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago

No no Trump, you need to carry this baby to term!

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 38 points 4 months ago

Looks like SLAM is back on the editor menu, boys!

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What made him decide he needed to placate the centrists? Internal polling not doing so great? Trying to backtrack that total abortion ban? Watch out the qnuts might decide to go with Kennedy.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That about the Qnuts would be excellent.

[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago
[-] MrPoopyButthole@lemm.ee -4 points 4 months ago
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

The terroristic threats in this one are a good way to get a visit from a three letter agency.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
493 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19088 readers
1986 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS