372
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 3 months ago

Disgusting.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 68 points 3 months ago

Party of “free speech” ಠ_ಠ

[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 49 points 3 months ago

Party of Free Hate Speech

FTFY

[-] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 5 points 3 months ago

This is exactly it. Conservatives don't want free speech for others: they want free speech for themselves, which in their minds also means that no matter what they say nobody can react negatively to it in any way. They specifically don't want anybody else to have any freedoms; the core of conservatism is social dominance over the Other

[-] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

would include any discussion of homosexuality

Guess that bible is right out of those libraries

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

It is a slightly amusing irony that this necessarily includes any books that tell kids that homosexuality is evil and wrong.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

I’m sure they’ll carve out an exception for those eventually.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Probably not in any way that wouldn't involve malicious compliance like putting them on a special bigotry display. They would have to write a law so long and with so many specificities that it would be virtually impossible. Maybe if they actually listed the "acceptable" books by name and said that they could not be mocked?

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I was thinking something like Christofascist parents bringing a list of books to the Christofascist school boards that have been deemed sufficiently full of hate as to be individually approved to be in the classroom.

I dunno. I’m just so cynical on all this stuff these days that it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they found a way. Keeping my fingers crossed I’m wrong.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That wouldn't shock me since they're already presenting lists of books that should be banned, but putting a list of the names of all of the approved books into law would be so unprecedented in terms of a first amendment violation that I don't even think the SCOTUS we have now would be okay with it.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

At least the version we know.

If someone actually reads and studies the bible they can come to the realization that god loves all equally, and all the hate is just from what parents and your congregation has taught you.

They might have a different bible (trump bible) or it may be already in the works that they plan on replacing it with.

Heck, they might have plans from banning any holy book that isn't their approved bible from everywhere, even people's homes if trump is ellected, sort of like how they did in the movie "v for vendetta".

[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Unless you are white, male, CIS-het, and an evangelical Xian, they are coming for you to. You're just a bit further down the list.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

They're coming for you even then if you aren't rich.

[-] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 11 points 3 months ago

But surely the leopards won't eat my face

[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They’re coming for you even then if you aren’t rich.

Yep. There's "rich" relative to most folks, then there is couldn't-spend-all-my-interest-income-in-a-thousand-lifetimes rich.

The real leopards know which is which.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 months ago

Damnit Idaho, again with the bad behavior :/ One of my niblings is trans, they've got to grow up in that state, it's not going to be easy. I grew up in that state before I knew I was trans but everyone including me sensed something off and even that wasn't easy. I wish there was more I could do from where I am now but best I know is to make sure they know I support them and have their back in what ways I can

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Nibling is a gender-neutral term used to refer to a child of one's sibling as a replacement for "niece" or "nephew". The word is thought to have been coined in the early 1950s, but was relatively obscure for several decades before being revived in recent years.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/words-were-watching-nibling

Huh. TIL. Thanks.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

My wife is a librarian here in Indiana and they've already tried passing a law like this once, so I don't have any doubts they will try again and it's terrifying.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Freedom of speech baby. Some have it, some don't.
Americans are in the don't category.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

Don't fuck with librarians... They have access to the chemistry books and are friends with the people who know how to use the magics contained within....

Seriously though, if you are on the opposite side from librarians, you're doing it wrong.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm my state the librarian can charge you with theft if you don't return a book after they send you a notice to return it.

[-] Agrivar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Hi My State, I'm Dad.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
372 points (98.9% liked)

News

23259 readers
3519 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS