340
asdf (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by user@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pewpew@feddit.it 27 points 4 months ago

I'm an X11 enjoyer and I'm proud of it

[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

X11 gang rise up

[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 months ago
[-] user@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago
[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Never seen tearing look like a cracked mirror.

[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

thats why i was asking...

[-] archchan@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago

I tried Wayland for the first time last week and my first reaction was "wtf this is so smooth". But some stuff was too funky so I went back to X11.

[-] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 10 points 4 months ago

I want to switch to Wayland but it hasn't treated me too well

Sad.

[-] ramius345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

I'll enjoy x11 until my distro makes Wayland the default.

[-] Xylight@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

I still haven't encountered any issues on Wayland on GNOME. X11 is unusable for me because it handles multiple monitors poorly, and everything just seems less smooth.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What do you mean by "handles multiple monitors poorly"? Is it something to do with scaling? The only issue I've encountered under X11 related to multihead is the inability to set different subpixel geometries for different monitors, but iirc wayland doesn't let you do that either? Just curious what your usecase is

[-] Xylight@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

I have mixed refresh rate monitors, and animations and stuff will use the lowest common denominator. So all animations will be in 60hz on my 144hz monitor, just because I have a 60hz secondary monitor. The biggest offender is moving windows around.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Ah, makes sense, thanks.

[-] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 months ago
[-] delopa@jlai.lu 8 points 4 months ago
[-] BFrizzleFoShizzle@lemmy.nz 8 points 4 months ago
[-] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'm more of a w3m guy myself

[-] linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

actually doing stuff is kinda cool tho

[-] delopa@jlai.lu 2 points 4 months ago

Yes it is, that's why I tend to use computers less. Hard as an IT technician 🫠

[-] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago

I have an Nvidia laptop and that still doesn't work well with either of them...

[-] nintendiator@feddit.cl 5 points 4 months ago

How did you even get the picture of the W fan? W doesn't even provide screen capture, nor global hotkeys to make PrintScreen work.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

? Yes it does. None of the Wayland apps I've installed that take screenshots have had any issue doing so, and global hotkeys in KDE work just fine.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

It doesn't, it just delegates the responsibility to something else, namely xdg-desktop-portal and/or your compositor. The main issue with global hotkeys is that applications can't usually set them, e.g. Discord push-to-talk, rather the compositor has to set them and the application needs to communicate with the compositor. This is fundamentally different from how it worked with X11 so naturally adoption is slow.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

Well yeah. Wayland is a protocol, not an application. There's nothing it can do except delegate to one of the two ends of the connection.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

These things are specifically not defined by the protocol. They could be. They're not, by design.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I agree that the deliberate design simplicity of vanilla Wayland is to its detriment, as does anyone who has ever interacted with Wayland. That said, there are extensions to the protocol which have been ratified by XDG and are supported by most compositors and applications that remedy most of those issues.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Isn't that also more or less the case with X11? From what I understand, if you try to use bare Xorg without any extensions like Xfixes and Xdamage, it's pretty miserable

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I've recently go back to Linux (after >10 years), and so far I've only noticed that touchscreen works better on Wayland and that you can scale UI in smaller increments. Otherwise they behave pretty much the same.

[-] renzev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

At first I though this was just a regular shitpost but then I saw the screen tear edit lol

On a more serious note, is there a way to actually fix screen tearing under x11? I've always thought a compositing manager like xcompmgr would do it, but for me it only makes it worse?

[-] muffinmaster1024@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

i can fix it using "force full composition pipeline"

[-] Blinchik@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Wayland just doesnt work at all on my pc, bo womp

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Unless you need fractional scaling

[-] Aganim@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My laptop refuses to go beyond 30hz on 5120*1440, so Wayland and X11 both feel laggy. But at least X11 is stable, can't say the same for Wayland, no matter how much I want to like it.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
340 points (88.6% liked)

Memes

45642 readers
1154 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS