1029

Some people will be miserable no matter who is running

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 155 points 1 month ago

Can she remember what she had for breakfast? If so, she's got my vote.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 102 points 1 month ago

And this is why I'll never be president.

[-] LordTrychon@startrek.website 46 points 1 month ago

Seriously. I NEVER know what she had for breakfast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

I’d vote for you if you legalize my medicinal cocaine.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Don’t forget about my emotional support prostitute.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago

She could be a human suit full of spiders and she would have my vote.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 105 points 1 month ago

We’re electing a president, not a monarch. Nobody is above criticism, and there’s a weird segment of people who act like criticism from the left exists only to help the right.

Like, I actually saw someone say we shouldn’t do it because it’s too nuanced for the average voter, and sorry but I don’t do paternalism like that. If reading criticism of how a candidate isn’t far enough left makes you vote further right, that’s a basic political literacy problem.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

I mean, we could focus on defeating the GOP and the day after the election results come in start using social pressure to guide our elected officials. If the criticism risks the GOP seizing even more power, it might be counterproductive to your goals even if the criticism is valid.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Any good faith criticism of the Dem candidate should be obvious in its criticisms that R policies are inherently worse. For example, Harris’ record as DA is worth criticizing, but any bad decisions related to imprisoning people are going to be a million times worse under Trump, as Project 2025 shows.

[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago

Any good faith criticism of the Dem candidate should be obvious in its criticisms that R policies are inherently worse.

Your argument would be great if we didn't live in the reality presented below. There are too many people sitting on the fence who legitimately cannot discern between a mediocre candidate and a career conman, criminal rapist. Where you see nuance, others see "she's no better than Trump".

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20240721200927/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/elections/polls-president.html

I like Harris as much as I like Biden, which is not at all, but the alternative is the very real possibility of the end of America.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago

For my money those charts will look very different after the next debate.

There’s also not a combination of words that’s going to convince me leftists criticizing Dems are going to kill America. Even if Trump gets elected, you are missing every potential lesson if what you take away is “leftists too mean.”

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 month ago

Because when all those people do is criticize Democrats, sabotage outreach efforts, and don't put any time or effort into defeating fascists, then it is very obvious where they stand.

Like I get it - huffing farts from time to time is great. But you gotta take a break and mix some productive advocacy and outreach if you actually care about Democracy instead of just smelling farts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Maybe I'm super cynical, but does that really matter on Lemmy and the platforms connected to it?

Like, who's reading this comment section that's actually on the fence about going out and voting for a Harris ticket? It has to be a miniscule fraction.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 month ago

Some people think criticizing is the same thing as not supporting.

If you want things to get better, you have to honestly and critically examine your leaders, not blindly support them and pretend they are flawless. Shutting down criticism is short-sighted nonsense and will only lead to worse candidates in the future.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago

Right. The problem with the current political atmosphere in America is that only one of the two parties is actually self-critical. The other is a cult of personality that can do no wrong. They set the reality from the top, and everyone below falls in line.

Only one side of the political aisle in the US will ever actually admit they were wrong about something instead of doubling down on it. Only one side will, at this point, admit defeat even.

In a Real Politik sense, this is a weakness.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Qwazpoi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Exactly. Those in the highest positions of power should damn well have criticism. The argument otherwise seems to imply that accountability and transparency have no place in American politics

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 48 points 1 month ago

Probably, but misogyny and racism is easier to call out than defending an old man who shouldn't be behind the wheel of a car, let alone a country.

And Trump is still too damn old, even ignoring the fact that he's a repugnant human being to boot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blazera@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

I was a major biden naysayer. Id always love more but this was a huge ask that was answered. Lets kick republican ass

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

I'm sure the Russians already have their list of alliterative agitprop ready to test on .ml before pushing the best ones to prod on Reddit and Facebook.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The positive take would be to start with the "Trump is too old for 4 more years as a President" memes.

Instead we have these "those who don't instantly bend the knee are against us" memes that, frankly, have quite the wiff of the typical Far-Right/Foreign Propaganda Op purposefully sowing division on the Left.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kromem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

I don't know.

I really dislike Harris. She's probably the bottom of my pick list for the nominee and a Dem President.

But it's not like a gaping sore of a liability the way Biden was.

I'm excited the conversation can finally shift to "Trump fell asleep during his own convention? Doesn't he seem tired in his speech?"

I think it being a woman nominee is an interesting newsworthy discussion point at a time when the other party is actively working to harm women - even if she's the last of the many other qualified women I'd rather see in the position.

I don't like her, I don't like listening to her nonsensical off the cuff statements, I thought she did very poorly in the 2020 campaign, I am anxious about a law enforcement politician as President in a system with too much Presidential power over the Justice department.

But in spite of all that, I just don't care enough to push back strongly on her.

She's boring in the neoliberal way we've gotten used to, but she's not addled and she's not a neo-Nazi, and with an interesting VP pick she's a ticket I could potentially even be excited about four months from now instead of watching her be put into a nursing home as the October surprise.

I'd love to see an actual competitive open convention, but barring that I'm just going to accept a turd sandwich that's palatable, as even that seemed like a stretch a week ago, and I'll take what I can get.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just a reminder that Harris has a voting record to the left of all Senate Democrats.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/kamala_harris/412678/report-card/2020

[-] hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 month ago

from your own link, that’s only because she’s the least bipartisan dem in the senate.

govtrack’s “left-right ideology” ranking is flawed, it doesn’t look at the content of the bills at all. in govtrack’s own words the ideology ranking “may be measuring something else, perhaps something more closely related to partisan-ness”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bouh@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

She's a woman, and she's black, of course there will be opposition.

[-] VoterFrog@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It'll be interesting to see what minor controversy from her past that voters glom onto and equivocate with Trump's blatant assault on democracy.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

She argued in court in favor of California's death penalty, and she threatened to jail parents of truant kids while she was the DA in San Francisco. It's more complicated than those sound bites--like, it was her job to argue the state's position--but you'll get the sound bite opposition.

I don't like Harris since I support 2A rights in addition to things like LGBTQ+ rights, and right to choose, but I like her odds of winning more than I liked Biden's.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 month ago

She's also half Indian and therefore also Asian. She is like a Republican's "all you can hate" buffet.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 28 points 1 month ago

eyup. new directive is pushing the harris bad narrative now that project get joe to drop is complete.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] fantasyocean@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 1 month ago

And I will remain blind to them. America is about to live in the context of the Coconut Lady. (I will support whoever gets the nomination at the end of the DNC.)

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

I would support a steaming pile of Biden's dogs shit over that old as fuck racist rapist with 34 felonies. VOTE

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cowbob12@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

This whole debate among the American left just feels to me as a big sign of "letting perfect be the enemy of good"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thus far I've only seen memes over people salty about Biden making the right decision talking about rhetoric switching to Kamala. In fact I've seen several now.

It's like you want something to push back against so bad you need to make it!

Edit:

Yeah I was wrong... Jimmydoreisalefty is spamming anti Kamala memes right when Russia starts their 9-5 shifts like it's his job... Oh wait

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

What will the tankies use to justify not voting now?

Probably her prosecution of Marijuana possession.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1029 points (93.4% liked)

Political Memes

5168 readers
2396 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS