161
They’re scared.
Scared and Senile, good luck Republicans lol
Old people are notorious for making their way to the polls. Attacking Trumps age must be done carefully as the wrong statement will make grandpa and grandma run to vote for trump.
By that logic it should have made them run to vote for Biden too and yet here we are.
Grandma and Grandpa aren't on Lemmy.
Most people that are old enough to be offended and would vote for the rapist with 34 felonies are already voting for the shit stain.
Don't be so sure, sonny. I'm nearly 60 with two grand-kids.
I promise you you're the exception for people your age. No one I know over 50 has heard of Lemmy.
And also, if old people are so sensitive to attacks on old age why wasn't Biden leading in the polls?? That's been the main attack on him for years, and people have said much worse about him than what is said about trump in this thread. If people suddenly clutch their pearls when it's Trump being mocked for being senile, they were a Trump supporter to begin with.
No one I know has heard of Lenny regardless of their age.
hi, 55 here... :D your point is valid and we are outliers lol
I'm over 50: 57. And my account's older than your's, too.
You're making assumptions you have no basis for.
Maybe they also should try running a younger candidate.
they scared hohoho
The laugh. I FUCKING KNEW it. They are so predictable. They did the same thing with Hillary, too, BTW. It's almost as if they hate women.
They do. That's why they want to own them rather than encouraging them to be themselves.
That’s the best they got?
Assholes.
Edit: worse. Uncreative assholes.
Republicans have to have known that running against Harris was a possibility from the instant someone as old as Biden picked her for VP.
This is what they came up between then and now. They're flailing because they either have nothing or have no idea what they can get to stick.
Kamala has notoriously been one of the most invisible VPs in recent memory. I actually think that could work in her favor. What in her record from the last 4 years is even attackable? She can campaign on all of Biden's wins as his VP, but all of her negatives are from before she was VP and are well known by now. She won't lose voters over those things at this point.
Her bad stints as VP are mostly thing Democrats might complain about but pretty much knew were impossible. She got saddled with voting rights and the border, but without any power to even try to do anything. It was just to keep Biden away from the no-win issues.
She could say, they got a bipartisan bill across the finish line and Trump killed it because he wanted to run on it. There's her border counter.
There was this thing where Biden put her in charge of some border stuff, she flew to South America to tell people not to come. I'm sure they'll attack her using that, but nobody really cares.
But.....unlike Biden, she would have the presence of mind to remind people that there was a border solution, negotiated by James Lankford of Oklahoma, who's as hard right as they come, THAT TRUMP CAUSED TO BE KILLED BEFORE IT GOT TO THE HOUSE!
It's literally Trumps fault that the border isn't secured right now. That bill had everything needed and was a literal wish list for Republicans on border security!
They killed it so they would have something to hammer on about. Fucking shameless fucks.
Kamala has notoriously been one of the most invisible VPs in recent memory. I actually think that could work in her favor.
I agree. Biden had downward momentum. Harris does not. Him leaving the race disrupts what Republicans were doing.
Don't underestimate these character attacks. All it took was one "Yeah!" for Howard Dean to slip.
In fairness, Dean's party wanted him gone. He didn't make it to the general.
I'm surprised they aren't saying she's a slut like most of the Trump supporters are on Twitter right now. This is what Democrats need... A candidate that brings out the worst in the Republican party. They should "leak" that AOC is a top VP choice.
Oh, there was a poster on Denver Post that kept calling her "heels-up Harris" back around 2020, and for as long as DP still had comments. They'd take down a lot of comments (for instance, mine - they even suspended my account for weeks for using the original name for what the "tea party" called themselves - the teabaggers), but then let disgusting comments like that stay, including threats of violence. And still, the right wing trolls would claim Denver Post was liberal, FFS.
Anyway, yes, they've been claiming she slept her way to the top for a very long time now. It will be nothing new. Meanwhile, their Qbert can be caught giving a guy a handy in a public theater, while vaping and surrounded by children, and say nothing. Obviously Kamala's a Democrat, so must be a slut, but Qbert is a Godly Xtian Upstanding Freedom Bible Lady.
I really could not care less about how a person laughs. I'm more concerned about what a person laughs at. Has Trump ever laughed at anything that didn't involve either his own good luck or someone else's misfortune?
Not fucking likely.
I'm so sick of the new meaning of "drop" being nearly the opposite of the old meaning. Ugh
I agree, this usage of it was bad.
So when they said Biden dropped out...?
To drop out is a whole different verb phrase than to drop.
I love it when ad hominem attacks start up... Means A) they're scared, B) they don't have anything else, and/or C) they're too dumb and uncreative to attack anything of substance
She should have every campaign ad wrap up with pictures of Trumps endorsement checks to her previous campaigns.
I'm sure people would like a convicted felon with a wife who immigrated mostly to get citizenship. A person who responds to school shootings with suggestions to arm teachers, but also advocated for taking away guns. A person who brought in supreme court justices that ruled away freedom and privacy rights and the rule of law for everyone. A person who also gave away to corporations billions and billions but a paltry $1000 cheque to families in the hardest of times. Unless God was a self-serving narcissist I don't see any qualities God would approve of in Trump.
All of the above is much better than someone who laughs.
Something something unity, right? Republicans are hypocritical yet predictable sacks of shit.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
161 points (93.5% liked)
politics
19088 readers
1956 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS