409
submitted 3 months ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A coalition of former Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley voters pledged their support for Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential bid on Sunday, hours after President Joe Biden announced that he was dropping out of the race.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 109 points 3 months ago

Its the "Haley Voters for Biden" PAC.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago
[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They chucked 1 million at ads for Nikki Haley, so there is something there.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Perhaps a bunch of wealthy never trumpers. What a mad world.

[-] edgarde@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

It is not affiliated with the Stand For America or Nikki Haley for President PACs.

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Harris Voters from Biden Voters from Haley CAP

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

We encourage her to select a moderate VP like @GovernorShapiro, @RoyCooperNC, or @GovAndyBeshear.

I mean...ok? They're not awful, and I guess they could probably pull some halfway decent middle-America folks who are queasy about Trump.

I'd still prefer someone further left, but tbh they could do worse.

[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Coop is a lefty that presents well as a moderate. We had the fortune of seeing him in person at Lovett or leave it in Asheville. It was a good show.

It’s just that the NC GOP has such a lock on this state that there’s very little his administration can do other than be a blocker for their most batshit ideas.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

We don't have to be concerned about Kamala keeling over due to old age, so the VP can return to being unimportant again. A lefty vp would be great, but wouldn't make many waves

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

A bizarrely lefty veep would prevent a coup like a bizarrely theofascist Pence made us worry about Mr Trump's health ... Because look what happens if the prez is injured or sick. Right?

(Forever respect Mr pence for doing his duty on 6jan, despite going against party loyalty, which is very hard for Republicans to do, and halting the coup. And I'm sure had he gotten into that truck he'd've never been seen again)

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

A leftist VP can be a good foil for a president, a voice in an administration. And if Harris is nominated, wins, and a MAGAt nutter manages to murder her, then they would be president. A leftist that was vocally supportive of the Palestinian people could help reclaim some of the people that are threatening to sit out the election (...despite what a Trump win would end up meaning for them and the Palestinian people...).

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I absolutely understand what you mean, but the only politician I'd trust to represent the Palestinian cause is Tlaib, and as I understand it Michigan isn't ready to give her up

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

I think that Rashida Tlaib would actually be a bit too much for some 'moderate' voters, unfortunately. Depressingly.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If the Democrats retain the Senate, though, it will be with the slimmest of margins. So the VP will probably be called on to break several ties. Yeah, the VP will vote for whatever the Democrats want, but they'll still get their name in the paper.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

For all the times Kamala had to cast a tiebreaker (33 times) she didn't get in the paper much.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

This is good overall. I don't really follow the ins and outs of American politics, but from what I understand, Haley represents the moderate Republicans. She won Vermont and Washington DC in the primaries after all, states which are liberal but I imagine their conservatives are moderate nonetheless.

Great to see some common sense still injected into some people!

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah this is a good outcome. The anyone but Trump right was rallying behind Haley, and as much as some of us dislike Kamalas DA job, being 'top cop' thats gonna play well with them.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Biden announced on Sunday afternoon in a letter that he will not be seeking a second term in this year's presidential election and threw his support behind Harris.

Craig Snyder, the group's director, told Newsweek in an email on Sunday afternoon that the organization believes Harris "is best suited to defeat Donald Trump in November."

Haley, the former South Carolina governor and United Nations (U.N.) ambassador running for the GOP ticket, ended her campaign in March following losses on Super Tuesday in competition with Trump who is the Republican Party's presidential nominee.

She also polled well among moderates and college-educated voters that don't support Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda.

Snyder told Newsweek that Haley's "disparaging comments" were "motivated by political rather than substantive concerns, and we are certain that those comments will not be a decisive factor in the ultimate voting decision of the Haley voters whose extraordinary act in the primaries of protest against Donald Trump as the leader of the Republican Party means they are going to give the Democratic nominee at the very least serious consideration in November."

In another social media post, the PAC expressed support for Harris and wrote "We welcome @KamalaHarris taking the torch that @JoeBiden passed to her."


The original article contains 656 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
409 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4538 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS