167
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world 82 points 3 months ago

Do the vandals not think there might be cameras? Like lots of cameras?

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 35 points 3 months ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Oh! I know him! Yeah! That's Steve. He likes to steal peoples amazon packages.

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fortunately, the 2 people they are suing have been identified.

One of them actively drove their car into them, and tried to pin it on the waymo, and the other goes around slashing tires (and is claimed to have mental issues, which does make it more sucky if true).

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The intersection of "Luddite hooligan" and "stops to think about technological capabilities and future consequences before vandalizing stuff" is not large.

[-] ealoe@ani.social 6 points 3 months ago

Thinking is not vandals strong suit

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Vandalism is an act without much thought behind it.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

The remember kids, for your health and safety you should always wear a mask in public.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

Ronaile Burton…allegedly slashed the tires of at least 19 Waymo vehicles. … Burton’s public defender, Adam Birka-White, says in a statement that Burton “is someone in need of help and not jail” …

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

A technology that'll disproportionately benefit the disabled, drunk and disadvantaged while enabling an integrated transport network by making final mile economically feasible is attacked by selfish idiots and of course lemmy supports them because it's a new technology and apparently people here hate anything new.

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

Most people on this website already have relative security in life and only pretend to care about the people who are worse off.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 7 points 3 months ago
[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Good. Idiots attack these things.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago

how would this not be considered double jeopardy if they're already being charged for the crime?

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Criminal prosecution and civil liability are different. If the criminal conviction also includes restitution (pay for the damages) then there likely wouldn't be a need for a civil suit, but it's possible that the suit is to go after additional damages. For example, the criminal conviction might include $1000 in restitution to cover the property damage, but the civil suit might ask for money to cover lost revenue for the time the car was out of service.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
167 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
1000 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS