502

A new poll in New Hampshire shows Vice President Kamala Harris is six points ahead of former President Donald Trump in the battleground state.

The survey of more than 2,000 registered New Hampshire voters by Saint Anselm College took place on July 24-25, after Harris secured enough delegate support to become the likely Democratic presidential nominee.

Harris leads Trump 50% to 44% in the poll. A poll taken by Saint Anselm in June after President Biden struggled in the debate showed Trump edging out Biden in New Hampshire by two points.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 128 points 1 month ago

Great. Glad to hear it. But don't get complacent. Remind yourself that polls can change fast, and polling itself is a troubled science right now because of the difficulties involved in getting a statistically significant and unbiased sample with the advent of universal cellphones.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 53 points 1 month ago

I came in here for exactly this.

DON’T GET COMPLACENT

Here is how to volunteer for text banking, apparently. I plan to get off Lemmy and do some later today.

The fuckin world could still end in January. Don’t get all complacent.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep, and you don't have to limit yourself to just text banking too. There's post card writing, canvassing, phone banks, vote registration drives, etc.

Here's another site people can use to find a bunch of local volunteer opportunities around them

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Thank you for sharing that link! More people need to see it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago

I hope that orange fuck just gets crushed when election day rolls around. Then we'll never have to hear from him again.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

There is no scenario besides death where that last sentence is true. Even then you're going to be hearing the same shit from his supporters for a long time.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I think you're correct, but if he becomes completely nonviable, the party will phase him out. He's a useful-ish idiot right now. That might not be true for long, and then maybe his legal safety nets will stop protecting him once they see he can't do anything for them.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Look at the trend from across the world. The far-right is not crushed-- only kept at bay. Marine Le Pen and her party in France have been going at it for 7 years now. Without the tactical voting in previous elections, her party would have won. AfD surpassed the centre left SDP party as the second most popular party and it may only be a matter of time for another far right party to rule Germany again. And the far-right, as we speak, is in charge in Italy along with Mussolini's granddaughter. In Netherlands, Geert Wilders' party is finally in power despite initially losing 7 years ago.

The liberal media's celebration of any news of far right not winning in any country is false sense of security and deliberate attempt to misdirect the real root cause. If the underlying economic and social issues are not addressed, and the rich are being allowed to get even richer while the poor ever poorer, the far right will only inch closer and closer to attaining power again.

[-] ECB@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Yup, this is just a replay of early 20th century. Inequality exploded and eventually you had revolutions virtually everywhere (in europe and the west, ar least).

Some were extreme-left (communism)

Some were extreme-right (facism)

Some were far-left for the time (social-democratic, or "new deal" as it's known in the US)

Some were violent, some were relatively peaceful.

But they were basically all inevitable, the people were frustrated and willing to support whatever platform promised something 'different'.

We're at that point currently, but only the far-right is offering anything different, so even though it's a terrible option, people will gravitate towards it. The solution is to offer genuine vision of change from the left.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

he'll whine but I'm pretty sure if he loses he'll spend the rest of his time on house arrest at his resort

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

god that would be so awesome to see him decimated by a woman of color... the electoral college is a huge issue but there's finally some energy on the Dem side... we'll see.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jettrscga@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Do polls make anyone else unreasonably angry?

Unless it's 20 points, I can't fathom how that many people support Trump. He never says anything of value in any speech. There's no platform to support. He just needs power to avoid criminal consequences, and half the country is good with that.

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who answers these polls?

What percentage of the population?

What age groups?

What states?

Are these people who have answered polls in the past are on a list to call for other polls?

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

You only have to look back to the 2020 election or the support for Trump-loving Republicans in 2022 to recognize that there are still a ton of people who support that dumbass crook.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Who, here, has been "polled" in the past 10 years?

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I have. But a big part of that is that I respond to polls. I use to work for a survey call center and I know that kind of hell it is and how much completed surveys can improve their pay for the next month, so I tend to do them if they call me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah pretty much.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Something like 30% of your compatriots are mindless automatons. Only reason I’m not angry is because I’m desensitized to it. I have written down that fraction of America, those retrograde degenerates, since the early 2000s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

I got both my brother-in law and sister-in-law to sign up for automatic voter registration and mail-in-ballots! If you know people who lean left but are kind of apathetic voters, it pays to pester them (kindly)!

If everyone did this, we could massively amplify voter turnout.

It's also worth having those conversations with family and friends who lean right. You're the only ones who could possibly get through to them. Slow and steady is key.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago

Slow and steady is key.

Yeah. I tried "If you vote for Trump, you're a racist." That didn't go well.

What worked better was 4 granddaughters and a gay grandson. Sometimes you just have to play the long game.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yep, exactly! Also perhaps offering a trade, "Hey I'll watch one thing of yours if you promise to watch one thing I send to you." Then show them the documentary of, say, "The Brainwashing of my Dad."

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

This is what happens when Democrats listen.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

2% April, 8% July, 11% October is how much Biden was supposedly ahead in 2020. Then won by a bit under 8%.

Polls for New Hampshire in 2024 have been following a similar pattern. Harris being ahead 6% is slightly below Biden at this same time last election. Which isn't much to get hyped about.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Compare that to Biden's numbers a week ago.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago
  1. Polls are garbage.

  2. The Horse Race demands more polls

  3. Whatever the poll results are, see #1

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

I disagree that polls are garbage. If that were the case, Biden would still be running for president. With that being said, ignore the polls and make sure you vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 3 points 1 month ago

Does this also apply to exit polls?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Exit polls are marginally more useful. As always, and the thing polls do not account for: It Depends.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I lie at exit polls.
I'm not alone.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You dang kids and your rock and roll music!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] capital@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Don’t care. Just vote.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Yo. If she is elected, maybe he goes to prison.

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe his nepotistic kids with their stupid fucking faces could join him there.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Fucker should already be in jail. I cross my fingers everyday that he drops dead from something.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yo. If she is elected, maybe he goes to prison.

SCOTUS just whiplashed

[-] niucllos@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Keep in mind NH is only vaguely a battleground at the federal level, Biden won it by 7+ points in 2020 and they haven't voted for a Republican president since 2000 and even then Bush barely eked out a win. Push against the fascists still!

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

But what it does show is a major momentum shift. Going from Trump +2 after the debate (polling Biden vs Trump) to Harris +6 in the same state from the same polling organization is nothing to scoff at

Though as other people have said, polls don't determine elections, we do. Elections are only won when people get involved and when people vote

[-] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Harris is showing within the margin of error for polls nationally

What we really want to do is look at her chances of winning each state to see the probable delegate total but it's WAY too early to tell and either way we shouldn't get complacent

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

Each swing state specifically

[-] Bojimbo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I hear you, but Hillary took it by less than 1% in 2016.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Trump edging out Biden

Oh ffs the imagery. Phrasing, please.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Don’t worry! I’ll help you out here

Trump edging ~~out~~ Biden

There you go. I edited it for you.

load more comments (1 replies)

I like that USA is now talking about their own person instead of giving the orange one all the attention

[-] Thrife@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago
[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

New Hampshire Smash

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Supporting Trump is so 2016, get with the times...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
502 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS