158
submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

When I saw the title I thought it was about obesity caused by driving everywhere instead of walking.

[-] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 25 points 1 year ago

Of course they turn this into a plus for the "clean energy transition" and not into promoting fewer vehicles in the road

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Or even vehicles that are just the right size for their intended use.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

For the last month, I've been driving my project car to work - it's a weird little 4x4 from the 1980s. It has a 1300 cc engine which pushes it down the road just fine, in fact I'm often having to wait on people with much faster cars to get out of the way.

What's crazy about it is just how easy it is to navigate around traffic, or in parking lots. It's so small. It's like half the length of a crew cab F150. It's 16"/400mm shorter and 5"/127mm narrower than a Mitsubishi Mirage. It doesn't matter which way the parking spot is pointed, I can turn right into it. Parallel parking? It's a non-issue, doesn't matter if you pull in or back in. Narrow streets are no problem. Tires take forever to wear out, because it has truck tires on it but it weighs abiut 1/3 what a truck does.

While I'd rather have the ability to take a bus or train to work, it's going to be a while before that happens, it would be cool if we could at least drive to work without carrying 5,000 pounds of metal and plastic with us.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a pretty cool project car IMO

[-] Izzy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The world won't be satisfied until we are all driving tanks and live in air controlled domes because we have destroyed the atmosphere.

[-] TheMusicalFruit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I know this article is from a UK news outlet, but I think it’s interesting that the SUV they used in the headline photo would be considered a small SUV by American standards.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

A telluride is considered mid size in the US, and that looks like it would not fit on a single japanese road

NSFW 🚙

[-] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the NSFW tag. I threw up in my mouth a little.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A US study showed that children were eight times more likely to die when struck by an SUV compared with a normal passenger car.

Dr William Hicks and his team, from Imperial College London, have created a computer simulator to study air pollution from brakes.

The brakes in the large SUV had to work twice as hard as those in the small compact car, resulting in greater particle pollution.

This could be encouraged through traffic calming measures (20 mph speed limits should help), media campaigns and driver awareness courses.”

Prof Roy Harrison, from the University of Brimingham, who was not involved in the computer simulation study, said: “The results give new insights into the influence of vehicle weight and driving style upon regenerative braking in electric and hybrid vehicles, and the associated particle emissions reductions.

“They show that regenerative braking can lead to substantial benefits, but should not be used to detract from the effort to develop engineering solutions to this important emission source.”


The original article contains 597 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
158 points (95.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
57 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS