162

Trump Tried to Talk About Mifepristone & Sounded Like a Student Who Didn’t Do the Reading (www.jezebel.com)

submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago

“There are other things the federal government could do, not just [an abortion ban]. Would you direct your FDA, for example, to revoke access to mifepristone? That’s one of the things that’s been discussed,” one reporter asked Trump, according to the 19th. Trump responded, “Sure, you can do things that will supplement. Absolutely. And those things are pretty open, and humane, but you have to be able to have a vote, and all I want to do is give everybody a vote, and the votes are taking place right now as we speak.”

Our dumbest president of all time.

[-] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

Dumbest president so far.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 months ago

Yeah, sounds like he'll beat his own record if he manages to get in again.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 11 points 3 months ago

all I want is give everybody a vote

Mmhmm

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

He may give everybody a vote, doesn't mean he'll let them all count.

[+] xmunk@sh.itjust.works -35 points 3 months ago

This headline is extremely inaccurate. Trump has relatively moderate personal views on abortion (he just wants to win the election so he tries not to alienate voters).

That question response wasn't Trump trying to talk about mifepristone... it was Trump trying his damnedest to avoid talking about mifepristone.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

True. Except I'd argue Trump has zero personal views on any subject. His only "views" are what he thinks he has to say to win.

Remember folks, back in the before times he was a Left Coast Democrat. (Boy does that line piss off his supporters.)

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Trump has relatively moderate personal views on abortion

Found the Trump apologist. Sit this one out

[-] AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com 13 points 3 months ago

I hate Trump as much as the next guy but Trump has voiced opinions in both directions so maybe tone down the person aiming for accuracy on the subject.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

What? How the fuck am I an apologist? He has the moral backbone of a rubber band and just spouts whatever the fuck makes him more likely to get elected - and, once elected, he went hard into anti-choice to court the political favor of senate and house Republicans while helping to stuff the court with Heritage Foundation clowns.

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Exactly, it's not like Trump himself is a fundamental Christian with misguided but deeply held convictions. He is a narcissist that wants adoration, power and to be in a special position where you can dodge consequences.

[-] hohoho@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Can’t wait for Kamala to kick his teeth in at the September 10th debate. I think what OP might be saying is that Trump is a chameleon depending on his audience so in some cases he’s anti abortion and pro abortion in others.

[+] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[deleted]

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

There is actually a huge thing to consider with any kind of authoritarian system ideologically: Basically without fail, they will have a "rules for thee, not for me" dynamic behind the scenes. Make abortion illegal? It will still be possible to skirt the rules for the powerful, and pervert the right to control your own body as a woman into the privilege of powerful people - mostly men - to decide if they allow a pregnancy to continue.

Authoritarianism lives, psychologically, from having the people on top, the ones "worthy" in the eyes of ideology, being able to bend or fully circumvent the rules. Even today, this is clearly visible in how rich people, and even more so rich organisations, are treated differently in front of a court, where proper consequences seem to be an exception instead of the rule. This also shows in more fundamental, everyday mechanics of society, think of how the violence monopoly of the state more often than not rests on the tacit acceptance of excessive police violence. Where often, cops and paramilitaries in police roles within states are developing a self-image and identity, along the lines of "to protect society from itself and its horrendous violence, I must become a violent badass" - consciously or unconsciously enjoying the violence and control they can enact, or turning their heads when their colleagues do it, and reserving for themselves and their in-group the privilege to do so.

So, having someone like Trump, a clear narcissistic rapist, being both openly against abortion rights in his political platform while personally holding the belief of abortions being allowed, is no real contradiction at all. He can rest assured that if in power, he would have the privilege to force both consensual mistresses and victims of his assaults to have abortions anyway.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump has relatively moderate personal views on abortion (he just wants to win the election so he tries not to alienate voters).

Bullshit, his alleged personal views are meaningless in the face of actions, and his actions say he isn't moderate in the slightest.

Edited for an example from the beginning of his presidency:

March 2016 – “The answer is that there has to be some form of punishment,” Trump told a MSNBC town hall after being asked: “Do you believe in punishment for abortion, yes or no, as a principle?” After his response, the host then sought a clarification on his use of the word punishment: “For the woman?” And Trump said, “Yeah, there has to be some form.” Following widespread criticism, Trump later walked back his comments in a statement.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He boasts that he ended Roe.

I truly hope there's an overwhelming response, because if every woman recognized the threat he represents and voted accordingly it would be so very, very satisfying.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024

162 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19088 readers

1843 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News