559

Melbourne Symphony Orchestra cancels pianist’s performance after dedication to journalists killed in Gaza (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 months ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/world@lemmy.world

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 188 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's astonishing many organizations in wealthy democracies are terrified of the slightest criticism of Israel's genocide.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

Even the Israeli government pretends to be sad that journalists die covering wars. They’re more extreme than this?

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

They are terrified of repercussions from the US.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] obinice@lemmy.world 113 points 4 months ago

I guess we know their stance on killing journalists, then.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 88 points 4 months ago

I just wouldn't go to that symphony anymore. Nothing wrong with supporting not killing journalists. It's not like he went out of his way to espouse his views.

load more comments (2 replies)

[+] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 83 points 4 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

[deleted]

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 37 points 4 months ago

The article quotes him saying more:

The five-minute piece is dedicated to the journalists of Gaza and was written for Gillham, according to D’Netto’s website. On Wednesday morning, Gillham’s team released the full transcript of what he said while introducing Witness.

“Over the last 10 months, Israel has killed more than one hundred Palestinian journalists,” Gillham told the crowd on Sunday.

“A number of these have been targeted assassinations of prominent journalists as they were travelling in marked press vehicles or wearing their press jackets. The killing of journalists is a war crime in international law, and it is done in an effort to prevent the documentation and broadcasting of war crimes to the world.

“In addition to the role of journalists who bear witness, the word Witness in Arabic is Shaheed, which also means Martyr.”

[-] EurekaStockade@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Nah it wouldn't be that, those sorts of land acknowledgements are very common in Melbourne, especially in the Arts, that would have been perceived as utterly uncontroversial by the MSO

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 9 points 4 months ago

He was cancelled for calling Aboriginal people victims of settler-colonialism in Australia

Extremely unlikely. Australia's colonial history and its impact on Indigenous Australians is a very common theme in modern Australian classical music and many concerts I have been to, including one just the other week, have conductors or soloists introduce the piece and specifically cite the context behind it. Unless the MSO is significantly different (which it doesn't appear to be, based on some quick searches of Indigenous-themed concerts) this is not the reason. It was his comments about Israel targeting and killing journalists (what you quoted is not the actual introduction he made at the concert) which led to the cancellation.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 78 points 4 months ago

Wow, magnificent self-own by the Orchestra manager. Dedicated to journalists killed in Gaza - not Palestinians or Israelis or Hamas or the Israeli far right or IDF, but journalists in the broadest sense of the term. Who fucking cancels a show over that?

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 49 points 4 months ago

People who don't want you to know that Israel is slaughtering everything in Gaza

Ain't it great to see US political leadership tuck their dicks for Israel after IDF slaughter US nationals in west bank or Gaza?

MoSt PoWERFuL CuNTrY

load more comments (9 replies)

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 28 points 4 months ago

Because everyone knows who is killing journalists in Gaza

[-] Custodian1623@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

it was pretty specific if you read the article

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 6 points 4 months ago

It wasn't actually that broad, he specifically mentioned that Israeli armed forces have targeted and killed journalists in Gaza.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 4 months ago

Which is a actual true comment. Isn't an opinion, it's a statement of fact.

What sort of brain dead organization cancel somebody over the statement of a fact?

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 76 points 4 months ago

The MSO has already backed down and is rescheduling the concert.

[-] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago

it made "an error"

spineless cunts

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 37 points 4 months ago

Pussies twice over.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 4 months ago

Extremists always think that everyone agrees with them. They usually are unprepared for the scenario in which this is not the case.

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 30 points 4 months ago

What a bunch of fascists.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Sad Violin.mp3

load more comments

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024

559 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39365 readers

932 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.