21
debate (lemmy.world)
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Davel23@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Not sure I get this one...

[-] samothtiger@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

It implies that book alien does not think the debate would be entertaining so the debate would be about if the debate was entertaining. It’s a similar concept to the Monty Python “I came here for an argument” skit where the argument ended up being on whether being contrary was the only need to have an argument.

[-] oldGregg@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

It’s a similar concept to the Monty Python “I came here for an argument” skit where the argument ended up being on whether being contrary was the only need to have an argument.

No it isnt

[-] samothtiger@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago
[-] zalack@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago
[-] nLuLukna@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

You cannot prove that it isn't however. And until you can prove that it isn't, by virtue of not being proven, it has not been proven. And as such it has not been proven and is therefore unproven. So yes it is.

[-] agilob@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

A claim without evidence can be rejected without evidence!

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Strange Planet by Nathan W. Pyle

7095 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to Strange Planet comics by Nathan W. Pyle.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS