Real Men™ don't vote for rapists.
Real Men™ rescue puppies:
Imagine Trump with a dog
I have seen his pictures with Lindsay Graham
Don’t compare a dog to that piece of shit.
I think they meant dog shit.
Lindsay Graham is a piece of dog shit.
I prefer my dog's shit to Lindsey Graham.
He'd probably shoot it in a gravel pit or something
He passed on that VP and managed to pick a possibly worse one.
Nor do they vote for weird people, or people with weird VP picks.
Men are dumb.
Source: am man
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.
Good thing we only make up half lol
Well at least this dummy knows enough to vote for Harris.
That's not true!
Wait, I am a man. Wait, I'm dumb.
Among women, Harris had a 21 point lead, with 56 percent to Trump's 35 percent.
Oof
But the survey had a margin of error of 2.3%, so it really could be Harris leading Trump also. The wording of this article title is a helping hand for Trump when he is pouring over his printed out "news" his handlers give him every morning.
Most importantly, a significant proportion of the American population — well beyond what should ever be considered normal or acceptable — consider a sociopathic, convicted criminal, rapist, probable pedophile, who has never worked an honest day in his life, was born with a silver spoon firmly lodged deep inside his asshole, and very obviously suffers from multiple personality and neurological illnesses; they consider this person a viable candidate, when he should be confined to a padded room.
Now ask yourself this! If the Democrats represent freedom and Trump is the greatest threat America has ever faced (HE IS), why do the Democrats tolerate a turnkey totalitarian surveillance apparatus? Why would you watch the country straddle the precipice of fascism, and let a big brother style, gustapo surveillance apparatus, exist for your successor to just take over and command. Only 0.00000001% of your employees have ever stood against your criminal behavior, and you expect us to believe that these people would defend us from a hostile government or adversary?
It is truly sickening that this is even close.
My gender needs to step it tf up tbh
If you take out the stupid men, his support disappears.
There are still stupid women voting... Unfortunately
Correct. Men is quite broad (ha ha). Break it down by education and we have a cleared picture.
I know what you mean, but I didn’t mean education. There are well educated people who support Trump. I meant stupid people. If you take out the stupid people, educated or not, you take out all of Trump’s supporters.
Not with real men. Harris is winning with real men.
I'm ok with co-signing this particular No True Scotsman fallacy.
And my axe
As a complete outsider, being a woman in a country where half the men are Trump supporters sounds fucking terrifying.
It’s also kinda terrifying as a dude, tbh.
Note: That in no way diminishes or detracts from any part of what you said.
Yeah, I think that's a very valid point that I didn't immediately give enough consideration.
As a man, I'm completely embarrassed by what I see out of his male supporters, and I'm baffled by his female supporters when Trump's own wife and daughter don't want anything to do with him.
I can assure you it is fucking terrifying no matter what gender you are.
And it's been worse recently with the popularity of misogynists/bigots like Tate and Rogan.
How much were undecided, and how much were Kennedy supporters? You just know all those Kennedy nut jobs will come home to roost in Trump's column when he drops out. So it could be as bad as 55 Trump, 45 Harris - or with the error thrown in - 57 Trump 43 Harris.
I'm just saying.. you can get stage blood from amazon for like $10.
Ready for something creepy as fuck?
Revelations 13:3
And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast
You prove exactly how religion works and it hilarious
The even more silly part is people who still believe this stuff are the same ones voting for Trump.
This blog post got spread around the internet a few years back. Came to mind again the other day right after the shooting.
It was his ear. It was far from a deadly wound. Also the ear heals pretty fast.
They do bleed quite a bit. I fell and ripped a drawer pull off with my ear. The blood on my pillowcase looked terrible. My ear was fine after a couple of days.
No, he's just really old, and his skin tore a little when he got tackled by his guards.
Not even a scab
Wow. That is crazy.
Jokes and (valid) worries about how many men are still supporting this dumpster fire aside... A poll like this has got to be setting off the fire alarms at Trump campaign HQ and I am giddy as hell to see it. The last time Democrats came this close to winning the overall male vote was 2008. If this margin holds out we could be looking at an absolute blowout (or at least as close as one gets in today's climate). Shame the Senate map means we won't get a 60-seat Senate, though...
Thank goddess for the 19th amendment.
We really just need that twilight zone box that if you press the button you get 10,000 dollars but it kills the previous person who pressed the button.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News