51
submitted 2 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/scicomm@mander.xyz
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Honestly, my first thought at this title was "only 97%?" I kindof wonder what's up with the other 3%. Maybe just weird outliers. Kindof like Michael Behe who is actually a bona fide biochemist but he also advocates for intelligent design.

[-] sinkingship@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

The other 3% probably aren't all climate change deniers.

I would guess that a large chunk of those are more like 'the data is not sufficient or good enough to be absolutely, absolutely certain'.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
51 points (100.0% liked)

Science Communication

885 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources

Outreach:

Networking:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS