376
Abolish capitalism (lemmy.world)
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 40 points 2 weeks ago
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, it's just filled with PR speak to make it look like there's ethics when asked

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 weeks ago

Reforms to restrain the rent-seeking class were always an alternative to the preferred method of killing them and redistributing their wealth.

[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago

relevant quote

The revolutionary struggle is the very antithesis of the parliamentary struggle. In Germany, for four decades we had nothing but parliamentary “victories.” We practically walked from victory to victory. And when faced with the great historical test of August 4, 1914, the result was the devastating political and moral defeat, an outrageous debacle and rot without parallel. To date, revolutions have given us nothing but defeats. Yet these unavoidable defeats pile up guarantee upon guarantee of the future final victory.

from "Order Prevails in Berlin" by Rosa Luxembourg

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 21 points 2 weeks ago

She's right, but given our situation this misses the point. The ruling class wants you to think reforms are a "replacement" to revolution, but we don't need to accept that premise. Reforms weaken the ruling class, otherwise they would already be enacted. So I ask, por que dos?

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] pigup@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I too am suspicious of the number two. Two faced mf

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

What if reform the classist society? Checkmate Luxemburg.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Abolish US crony capitalism.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

You can just say capitalism

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago

So do you have a plan to abolish capitalism?

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Just one more meme will do it

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 6 points 2 weeks ago

They don’t have to. It will implode on itself eventually when it eats up the final resources available to it.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Can we figure out a method that won't take 95% of the population of the Earth along with it?

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

The idea that someone can have a plan is pretty silly (Pinky and the Brain silly).

The real question is do you have a plan to organize and survive when capitalism fails.

[-] tabris@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Abolishing capitalism will never happen in our lifetime, so you have to think smaller but more effective. What needs to happen is moving to a cooperative based capitalism, where a company or corporation is owned by all of the workers, with protection of independent unions. This will very quickly reduce the divide between the rich and the poor, as well as closing the gap between productivity and wages that has worsened since the 70's.

Do I expect this to happen? Fuck no. But it has a much higher chance than the abolition of capitalism, and has more support amongst people I've spoken to over the years when I've suggested it as a path forward.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Abolishing capitalism will never happen in our lifetime

Why? By all metrics, it is increasingly strained and on the verge of collapse, only accelerated in recent years.

Do I expect this to happen? Fuck no. But it has a much higher chance than the abolition of capitalism

Again, why?

[-] tabris@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Having spoken to so many people about this subject over my many years on this planet, the number of people that would actually want a revolution is so low that it's effectively zero. They don't want that kind of change. Having seen how resistant people are to give up their cars for the sake of their children's future, do you really think people would give up their many comforts to remove capitalism from the world? Fuck no would they.

But simple, small, understandable changes to the current system are much more agreeable. When I've suggested a cooperative approach, even the most resistant to change agrees that it would improve the situation for themselves, and that's a change that can be worked with, without others perceiving that change as coming from an absolute loon.

As others have said in this very thread, the western world is so resistant to revolution that the very idea of it will always be fringe. But cooperatives have been demonstrated to work, they just need to be applied to a much larger degree. It's understandable to the majority, it doesn't rock the boat too much, it's a feasible approach and it removes power from the top and returns it to the workers.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Having spoken to so many people about this subject over my many years on this planet, the number of people that would actually want a revolution is so low that it's effectively zero. They don't want that kind of change. Having seen how resistant people are to give up their cars for the sake of their children's future, do you really think people would give up their many comforts to remove capitalism from the world? Fuck no would they.

Capitalism's necessary mechanical contradictions that will lead to its collapse do not need the magical will or consent of the public to happen. Collapse will happen regardless.

But simple, small, understandable changes to the current system are much more agreeable. When I've suggested a cooperative approach, even the most resistant to change agrees that it would improve the situation for themselves, and that's a change that can be worked with, without others perceiving that change as coming from an absolute loon.

You can't get change just by getting people to agree with you, otherwise America would have Ranked Choice Voting, Medicare for All, free public College education, and legalized weed and abortion nationwide. You're repeating the failures of Utopian Socialists like the Owenites, you can't vibe policy into being, especially in a system hostile to said policy.

As others have said in this very thread, the western world is so resistant to revolution that the very idea of it will always be fringe. But cooperatives have been demonstrated to work, they just need to be applied to a much larger degree. It's understandable to the majority, it doesn't rock the boat too much, it's a feasible approach and it removes power from the top and returns it to the workers.

How and why? You're trying to magically summon these structures. How do you expect the ones at the top to allow this?

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

MLs have been predicting the "inevitable" collapse of capitalism for a century now. When can we expect some progress? :p

You can’t get change just by getting people to agree with you, otherwise America would have Ranked Choice Voting, Medicare for All, free public College education, and legalized weed and abortion nationwide.

I think this is great point. In spite of majority public support for issues like these, it's seemingly impossible to get either party to take action. That's not how healthy democracies are supposed to work. I'd probably agree that public support is a pre-requisite for change, but it's not always sufficient. If the public want something and the government don't agree (say, over suspending arms shipments to Israel), what can the public actually do about it? Really nothing, other than disruptive protests or taking direct action to physically stop the shipments. And then it's obvious what would happen to the protestors.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

MLs have been predicting the "inevitable" collapse of capitalism for a century now. When can we expect some progress? :p

I mean, regardless of what anyone individually or collectively wills, disparity is rising, wages are stagnating with respect to productivity, and enshittification is continuing. The logic and math behind Capitalism's unsustainability hasn't changed. Monopoly and Financial Capital are growing ever-more grotesque and are crushed under their own weight in search of endless growth. The fact that the US hasn't collapsed yet doesn't mean it hasn't been working towards that collapse.

I think this is great point. In spite of majority public support for issues like these, it's seemingly impossible to get either party to take action. That's not how healthy democracies are supposed to work. I'd probably agree that public support is a pre-requisite for change, but it's not always sufficient. If the public want something and the government don't agree (say, over suspending arms shipments to Israel), what can the public actually do about it? Really nothing, other than disruptive protests or taking direct action to physically stop the shipments. And then it's obvious what would happen to the protestors.

That's why the Owenites and Utopian Socialists all failed. They thought they could just convince everyone of a better path, and that it would magically appear and form around them.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

Revolution. Build up dual power and destabilize the existing system from the outside, rather than grinding yourself to dust trying to work it out from within the system.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com -2 points 2 weeks ago

im not looking to abolish capitalism just limit it to things that don't really matter. like how nice a tv folks have.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
376 points (92.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4115 readers
2067 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS