316
submitted 4 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago

Was that the song JD picked when he's romancing the foam?

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago

Trump has clearly decided to throw his donor’s campaign donations at legal fees and settlements so he can play whatever he wants at rallies.

The story isn’t the individual violation. The story is that he’s a rich fuck that has decided to pay to repeatedly break the law.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 months ago

When the penalty is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The story behind the story is that he can do that because he doesn't need to spend those funds on actual campaigning, because he intends to win by massive election fraud and/or massive false accusations of voter fraud (in order to fuck up the certification of the votes) instead of actually getting enough EC votes to win legitimately.

[-] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 27 points 4 months ago

I'm guessing this song was held at a rally or event run by some obscure created-for-purpose llc named like "Texans for Trump MAGA Event 2024 LLC" so that when they're sued the man himself and his campaign is effectively immune from prosecution.

Instead some lackey gets to deal with it and the only money that can be extracted is shared amongst other debtors from all the shit they didn't pay for after the event ended.

That's my speculation, but i'd be amazed if this isn't the way they do it.

Coleman said they were grateful that the judge agreed that it would be overstepping his power at this point in the litigation to order the campaign to take down existing videos.

So is youtube overstepping their power when they strip audio from all those content creators videos, demonetize them, or delist them? Just asking because a judge doesn't feel like he has the right to stop videos with stolen copyrighted media from being distributed so long as it's this fucking guy. Everybody else though? Crippling lawsuits, garnished wages, prison time... you name it.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 23 points 4 months ago

Lol, gonna be down to kid rock real soon. Maybe they could play some of early stuff when he was a rapper with a flattop fade before he sold out to be trailer trash and afraid of rainbows.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah I was honestly shocked when it turned out like ten years ago that he’s another Kevin Sorbo. I think he was being edgy rather than punk, if that makes sense.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah I was thinking it was joke at first. Then, well, yeah....

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 4 months ago

this isnt news, this is the trump campaign just doing illegal things regularly without prosecution. SOP

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Musicians have gotten sick of him.

[-] Skanky@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Believe me, it's not just musicians

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I would say use the Imperial March at this point but they'd get a letter from John Williams's lawyers

[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Why continue? Why not just sticking to those two artists who like him? Kanye and Kid Rock? Both spaced up beyond belief but (for some arcane reason) with a lot of songs people seem to like?

The presidential race is supposed to get you elected. You won’t be crowned the king of the universe for having the highest count of people you confirmedly pissed off.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I've heard "Happy Birthday" is public domain.

[-] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago
[-] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Woops. Not Apple. Warner music group

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
316 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19335 readers
901 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS