65
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Who uses pagers today? I have not seen one in years.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

From the article:

Why does Hezbollah use pagers?

Hezbollah has relied heavily on pagers as a low-tech means of communications to try to evade location-tracking by Israel.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

They are still very common in hospital settings. Those things are reliable as fuck.

[-] Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago
[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

The front usually doesn't fall off.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago

BBC reported they switched to pagers after they realized Israel was using mobiles to target leaders for assassination.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Pagers pierce walls way better than most tech. It's why a lot of hospitals still use them.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

they're also basically passive. a pair of AA's could last a month or so, and, because they're basically passive, you could pretty much receive them anywhere, including on planes.

Physically, they're also quite small, so they'd be more convenient to carry.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Are you iphone dunking on middle eastern terrorist communications?

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I only heard of pagers as a child. I did not know they were still in use.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 month ago

Who uses pagers today?

Hezbollah, apparently.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

NPR was saying earlier that they weren't the old-style pagers from the 90s, these are more like low-tech burner phones

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It was a Mosaad. They admitted it. It wasn’t actually that difficult, it was just pretty clever, considering the level of technology involved.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Judging from what I've seen so far from reports which are early and incomplete, I would eduguess that Mossad basically intercepted a particular brand of these 'pagers' known to be used by Hezbollah, put small bombs in them and wired them in such that they could be activated by a broadcast signal, and probably a lot of non Hezbollah people who just happened to buy this model of 'pager' in the target areas and timeframe for introduction of these tampered device onto the market also got an exploding hot pocket.

[-] Cornpop@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Genus attack really.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for BBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz04m913m49o
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
65 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1599 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS