138
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by yrmitz@lemmy.ml to c/unixporn@lemmy.ml

Why River over Hyprland?

  • Stable
  • Faster
  • Tag system - I was dwm user on x, so it felt comfy.
  • Minimal - I don't like rounded corners or confusing animations

Details

Dots: https://github.com/bitterhalt/dots-river

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Void is getting some attention recently. Nice.

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Ive been thinking about switching to it :3

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I can only say "good luck". It is not an easy distro. Though if the apps you use are available as flatpaks, you may be fine.

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Not easy to install or not easy to maintain? Or do you mean like a lack of packages

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Installation is pretty easy if you choose the Xfce version. The system is stable but many things in it (such as the init system) are unpopular which makes the learning curve very steep. The repo doesn't have that many packages so you have to rely on Flatpak (or Snap but idk if it works on Void) for software support. Hardware support and drivers may be an issue because of that as well.

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Ah ok gotcha. My plan was to try dual booting so i still have a working arch system in case something doesn't work. Thanks for the tips!

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

I love Void, but the small repo did make me change to Artix with Runit.

Honestly, Void is pretty straightforward, great distro.

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I keep forgetting artix can do runit, I'll have to tinker with that

[-] yrmitz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think Void is much easier to maintain than Arch. And I was on Arch for 4 years. Runit is super simple too.

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

I'm glad to hear it!

[-] yrmitz@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Void has been great. I was using Arch for the last 3-4 years, then I tried Void just out of boredom and found myself liking it so much that I left it as a daily driver.

[-] hellofriend@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Nah man, that's not a river

[-] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Never heard of river but looks really cool! Come to think of it, I haven't heard or a bunch of this stuff- yazi looks really neat

[-] bthalt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

It is very solid WM. If you have used dwm before, you feel like home. Yazi is like modernized lf/ranger clone written in Rust, it is very fast and comes with sane defaults.

[-] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Yazi sounds ideal! Does river involve as much set up as dwm? I really love the ideas behind suckless tools but they normally involve a lot or set up to configure hoe I like.

[-] bthalt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, River is more like i3, Sway and bspwm, really simple and does not Require coding skills. Config is a shell script but it is really simple.

[-] furycd001@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Loving that nvim config.. Using a similar one myself....

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
138 points (99.3% liked)

Unixporn

15397 readers
49 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No Defaults
  3. Busy Screenshots
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW
  7. No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS