209
submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

They're not blurring the line, they're treating any immigrant like they're not here legally. They're erasing the line

And have been for a while now.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Not any immigrants, just the ones with darker skin.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Literally simping for the African immigrant Elon Musk.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Harder than for Melania!

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

"immigrant" is just a handy smokescreen they can put up in front of their attacks against non-whites, just for being non-white

[-] kinsnik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

yeah, soon they will "blur the lines" between immigrant and non-whites too

Exactly! That's why they're talking about "remigration" and the like..

Not only that, but even those born in the US. Basically rescind or render ineffective the 14th amendment.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 months ago

"Blurs the line?"

Ok, let's try an experiment: "Hitler blurs the line on Jews, Romani and actual criminals ".

How does that read, Mr Journalist?

Fuck these false-objectivity, milquetoast, water-carrying fascist apologists.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

~~"...Blurs The Line..."~~ "Wants To Pick and Choose"

Fix that for ya

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

In a troubling sign of how the xenophobia at play here may be yoked to the powers of the federal government in a Trump II presidency, Sen. JD Vance (R-OH, ironically) insisted on continuing to call the Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio “illegal aliens” even though they are legal immigrants.

When confronted by a questioner about the Haitians being in the country legally, Vance played to the crowd and, with stubborn grandiosity, stuck to his false claim denying them their legal status:

Btw this is why they call everything they oppose a slippery slope: because it's what they want to do with their policies, and they project that's what other people want to do too.

[-] dwemthy@lemdro.id 8 points 2 months ago

Immigrant status is just the start. They don't care about what laws mean at all, and the crowd cheers for it.

[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Racists like to dance around the issue to make it a "us or them" situation, and make you pick a side.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Talking Points Memo - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Talking Points Memo:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://talkingpointsmemo.com/morning-memo/trump-vance-intentionally-blurs-the-line-between-legal-and-illegal-immigration
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
209 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS