We must block Donald Trump, which is why we urge Uncommitted voters to vote against him and avoid third-party candidates that could inadvertently boost his chances
Isn't this just saying vote for Harris?
That’s just endorsing Harris with extra steps.
I guess what they're trying to say is "We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn't represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that's the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome."
But if that's so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.
As if this isn't the shit people have been trying to tell them for months now...
Particularly because some will take that to mean they should vote third party, which given how our shitty electoral system works, is essentially just a vote for Trump in terms of the end result.
But mah integriteh!!!! Mah principals!!!!
We endorsed Harris with a Venn Diagram.
Sometimes it's more about the journey than the destination
Best comment
It’s a way to reframe the argument from a vote FOR a milquetoast candidate, to one AGAINST a would-be Dictator.
Know that none of the 3 possible options for voters will immediately stop Israel’s current terror campaign on Palestinians and the Lebanese.
Instead, all it does is set up the future environment and Government whom you can influence the actions of. Only ONE option provides an opportunity which could reign Israel back in, and it sure as shit isn’t a possible 2nd Trump administration.
Yes, but I imagine the roundabout is to maintain pressure.
I want Kamala to win but I also want her to fix the fucking gaza problem, and she can't be allowed to forget that.
Yep. But they’re still uncommitted about it, so it’s fine.
It's a two party system. Doing anything else but voting for Harris is helping donnie, which is only going to make the situation in Gaza even worse if he wins.
There isn't a place on the planet that will get better if he wins.
Russia will, or at least the parts where putin owns
The mansions and luxury resorts of oligarchs?
(By which I mean oligarchs the world over, by whatever name they may be called. At some point, nationality stops mattering if you're mega-rich and just becomes a means to consolidate even more power.)
Seems like there's an easier way to go about that...
Leftists and enlightened centrists unified in disdain for both parties, but knowing they've got to do their bit to stave off the rise of fascism.
The irony. Uncommitted to the very end.
It's nice that they won't endorse the fascist, but how bad is it if you can't endorse the nonfascist.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News