141
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 40 points 1 month ago

Well the primary reason they would "backfire" is because Trump is perfectly consistent about being full of shit. There is literally no way that he's going to do something that benefits anyone other than himself. We've had 8 years to learn that.

[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

We've been hearing about this turd since the 1980s, he's never done something to benefit another human since then.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah the guy lies every time he opens his mouth.

The only way I'd ever believe he has any sort of plan is if they actually showed us in detail what the plan entails and what the possible effects the plan would have including positive and negative things. But there is no way republicans would come up with a plan that detailed. trump would just show some more unopened binders with stacks of blank papers.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

There's a lot of shady shit with farm subsidies...

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/01/farm-bill-funds-lawmakers-00093821

And if Trump did actually do anything, it would be massive subsidies to the big farms and limiting import to drive up the price.

If we're lucky we'd end up paying the same price but shit would always be running out, this k England immediately after Brexit.

But the wealthy would make a shit ton more money.

[-] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Rural conservative farmers are the biggest welfare queens you can dream of, but they always moan about the liberals and "coloreds" taking all the money with their laziness.

I never understood why those folks thought corporate welfare was the only acceptable form of welfare.

That article mostly focuses on a member of Congress also being the owner of a farm. There was an important point made as well - farms can't be paused or put on hold as easily as other types of businesses,

“It’s one thing to turn off your professional business, another to be able to turn it back on,” he said. “But once you give up your farm, it might never be possible to restart.”

It's an understandable concern, but not the biggest one. Better savings and efficiencies may be available by targeting the major agribusinesses first. (One member of congress admitted to owning a $1 million farm, compared to the $165 billion industry overall.)

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Anyone with a brain listening to the shit he spews knows it will be bad for anyone that isn't already in the owner class. Hearing the conservative chuds in my state talk about how Harris will make shit more expensive and Trump will save us makes me literally laugh in their face. Thank you, Trump. Your dumbass as enabled me to laugh in the face of your followers and instead of getting instamad they stop and think cause they know we're in the same financial class, and "if Mr Smart Computers Man is gonna have a bad time maybe so will I." You gave me all the ammo I need to spread doubt among your faithful and I have done it with the intensity of a California wildfire.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's just like anything else that comes out of his mouth. I assume the exact opposite would happen if he's elected.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Why are news outlets still pretending anything Trump "vows" isn't just random bullshit he said?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Axios, are you fucking stupid? Goddamn.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Axios:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.axios.com/2024/09/21/trump-grocery-prices-food-imports
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
141 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19080 readers
2374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS