Well the primary reason they would "backfire" is because Trump is perfectly consistent about being full of shit. There is literally no way that he's going to do something that benefits anyone other than himself. We've had 8 years to learn that.
We've been hearing about this turd since the 1980s, he's never done something to benefit another human since then.
Yeah the guy lies every time he opens his mouth.
The only way I'd ever believe he has any sort of plan is if they actually showed us in detail what the plan entails and what the possible effects the plan would have including positive and negative things. But there is no way republicans would come up with a plan that detailed. trump would just show some more unopened binders with stacks of blank papers.
There's a lot of shady shit with farm subsidies...
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/01/farm-bill-funds-lawmakers-00093821
And if Trump did actually do anything, it would be massive subsidies to the big farms and limiting import to drive up the price.
If we're lucky we'd end up paying the same price but shit would always be running out, this k England immediately after Brexit.
But the wealthy would make a shit ton more money.
Rural conservative farmers are the biggest welfare queens you can dream of, but they always moan about the liberals and "coloreds" taking all the money with their laziness.
I never understood why those folks thought corporate welfare was the only acceptable form of welfare.
That article mostly focuses on a member of Congress also being the owner of a farm. There was an important point made as well - farms can't be paused or put on hold as easily as other types of businesses,
“It’s one thing to turn off your professional business, another to be able to turn it back on,” he said. “But once you give up your farm, it might never be possible to restart.”
It's an understandable concern, but not the biggest one. Better savings and efficiencies may be available by targeting the major agribusinesses first. (One member of congress admitted to owning a $1 million farm, compared to the $165 billion industry overall.)
Anyone with a brain listening to the shit he spews knows it will be bad for anyone that isn't already in the owner class. Hearing the conservative chuds in my state talk about how Harris will make shit more expensive and Trump will save us makes me literally laugh in their face. Thank you, Trump. Your dumbass as enabled me to laugh in the face of your followers and instead of getting instamad they stop and think cause they know we're in the same financial class, and "if Mr Smart Computers Man is gonna have a bad time maybe so will I." You gave me all the ammo I need to spread doubt among your faithful and I have done it with the intensity of a California wildfire.
It's just like anything else that comes out of his mouth. I assume the exact opposite would happen if he's elected.
Why are news outlets still pretending anything Trump "vows" isn't just random bullshit he said?
Axios, are you fucking stupid? Goddamn.
Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Axios:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Search topics on Ground.News
https://www.axios.com/2024/09/21/trump-grocery-prices-food-imports
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News